The Infinite Zenith

Where insights on anime, games, academia and life dare to converge

Category Archives: Battlefield V

Battlefield V: A Reflection on the Open Beta

“This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.” —Winston Churchill

While Battlefield V may have been hampered by a sub-optimal marketing campaign, its biggest selling point lies within gameplay. The closed alpha was a fantastic opportunity to see how the new weapon mechanics and gameplay elements, such as attrition and squad play, functioned, although Battlefield V itself was evidently still in development at that stage; various bugs, such as being unable to spawn, falling through the map, being unable to change squads and performance issues were prevalent. As well, many features simply were not present in the build: the game’s progression and customisation system was a no-show in the alpha, for instance. By the time of the open beta two months later, Battlefield V has come a long way — the game handles very smoothly, and the stutter I experienced in the alpha, especially when being revived or spawning onto teammates, had been rectified. The classes have also undergone some changes, with the assault being assigned longer-range weapons for medium range, precise combat, and the medic class gaining access to submachine guns to fit their role as close-quarters support for squad members. Each class also gains a unique ability: assault players regenerate health faster, medic players can revive any teammate faster than squad members can revive squad mates, support players can build heavier fortifications, and recon players can run faster when damaged. The emphasis on unique class roles is carried over from Battlefield 1 — in conjunction with the fortifications and attrition elements, Battlefield V handles quite differently than its predecessors, forcing players to be even more mindful of their surroundings than in previous instalments of Battlefield. While these new elements seem quite daunting, they are woven into Battlefield V neatly, and ultimately, offer a new way to experience Battlefield, bringing tactical elements into the game and encouraging players to explore their environments in more detail than before.

At the end of the day, however, Battlefield V is a first person shooter, and as such, focus remains predominantly on the weapons and their handling. Battlefield 1 was frustrating with its random bullet deviation, which reduced the potency of skill in a firefight; players with sure aim and mastery of their weapon could still occasionally miss shots from this, and the time to kill was also quite lengthy. Battlefield V‘s closed alpha had a Battlefield 4-era TTK, allowing skilled players to drop enemies exceptionally quickly, and with some weapons lacking recoil and the insufficient damage indicators, meant firefights were somewhat frustrating if one did not get the drop on their opponents. By the open beta, it seems DICE has gone with a balance between the two extremes: TTKs are faster and more satisfying than those of Battlefield 1, but slower than the closed alpha’s allowing players to duck out and escape fire if they chose to. The open beta continues to show that Battlefield V is a game of methodical team play — my best games were experienced by moving together with my squad and picking my engagements. I had no trouble topping the scoreboards and maintaining a positive KD ratio when I played this way. By comparison, in games where I became impatient to try out a newly-unlocked gun, I was slaughtered. If Battlefield V intended its players to cooperate and master its mechanics over aggressively charging into a scenario and counting on no-scopes to win the day, it has certainly succeeded in doing so. While the open beta proved quite enjoyable, the insight it provides into Battlefield V‘s progression system leaves much to be desired. Battlefield 3 and 4 had a solid system, unlocking new weapons, gadgets, attachments and weapon camouflages. Different weapons, gadgets and attachments allow players to very precisely pick their play style, giving a sense of immersion. This disappeared in Battlefield 1, and while Battlefield V‘s progression system does incentivise players to advance their classes and weapons, the decision to split weapon customisation into cosmetic and functional aspects does not make sense. In particular, that weapons have a progression tree that continue to improve the weapon’s performance does not make sense: once one unlocks all of the upgrades, their weapon will be outright superior to the player who is using that weapon for the first time. By comparison, Battlefield 3 and 4 introduced the notion of side-grades, where every attachment offered a benefit in exchange for a disadvantage. A heavy barrel might improve weapon damage at range at the expense of hip-fire accuracy, and a compensator can help some unruly weapons with horizontal accuracy, but increase muzzle flash and make a player more visible. It meant tuning a weapon was an involved and fun task, and this is something that I miss from the earlier Battlefield titles. Similarly, with the archetypes still absent, one must wonder what roles they’ll play in the full game.

Screenshots and Commentary

  • It’s been a shade more than two years ago when the Battlefield 1 open beta ended, and I ended up with two separate posts detailing my experiences. At the time, I remarked that I would buy Battlefield 1 if it ended up with a solid launch, and two years later, with 195 hours spent in the game, I feel that the open beta proved to be a valuable contributor in helping me decide whether the game was for me or not. At present, the open beta for Battlefield V has concluded, and while there are many factors that need improvement, overall, my experience was a very solid one.

  • There are a total of forty screenshots in this post, and while it has been past tradition for me to open with me scoring a melee kill, the gunplay in Battlefield V is superb. When I spawned into my first match on Rotterdam, however, most of the combat was actually opposite to where I was, so I found myself exploring the map and trying to get to one of the capture points before dying to an assault player from around the corner. I subsequently hopped into a Panzer IV and shelled enemies trying to capture the train station.

  • The Panzer IV is likely in its Ausf. D form, and with its upgrade tree, I imagine that there should be no trouble in giving it the equipment needed to make it resemble the Ausf. F2 that Miho and her friends operate. Vehicle gameplay in Battlefield V is more skill-based than its previous counterparts: tank turrets are slower to rotate and have some inertia to them, meaning that one cannot simply look and immediately begin firing at enemies: the turret has to “catch up” to where one is looking before one’s shots begin landing.

  • Battlefield V‘s sniping mechanics are a return to the days of Battlefield 4 and 3, where center-mass shots were unable to kill in one shot at any range. Emphasis is returned to headshots, and sniper rifles again have different handling characteristics, whereas in Battlefield 1, bolt action rifles were largely differentiated by their sweet spot ranges and bullet speeds. The open beta starts recon players with the Lee-Enfield No. 4 Mk I, which has a ten-round capacity, a lower bullet velocity and a quicker firing rate compared to the Karabiner 98.

  • The medic class got the least use during my time in the open beta: I only reached rank two with the medic. While medics no longer carry a syringe gadget and thus, have a slot free for another gadget. I’m not sure if it was a bug or not, but I found myself resupplying teammates with the medic’s bandage pouches. This could simply be a UI error, although the absence of a dedicated syringe tool took some getting used to.

  • We’ve still yet to see all of the available weapons for Battlefield V, and I’m still hoping that the iconic MG42 will be available as an infantry-portable weapon for the support class. This would allow me to emulate the Karlsland Witch loadout: the weapon was infamous for its high firing rate and was nicknamed “Hitler’s Buzzsaw” for the distinct sound it made. On top of this, the weapon was incredibly reliable and had a quick-change barrel. With all of the sophisticated, detailed animations in Battlefield V, I would not be surprised if overheating an MG42 would result in the player manually replacing the barrel, which could be an innovative way to offset its high firing rate.

  • Having tried them with a greater frequency, I feel that reinforcements replace Battlefield 1‘s behemoths. This is quite welcome, since it means that players contributing to their team will have a chance to further assist with resupplies and powerful weaponry, but without needing to be on a losing team. The Sturmtiger was one of the reinforcements available to the German forces in the beta and the vehicle itself was originally intended for infantry support. I went on a short killstreak with it before getting over confident, driving it to point B and then watching as other players smashed the Sturmtiger with Panzerfausts after I got stuck.

  • Returning to Narvik, the dialed-back particle effects are noticeable, and the map looks a lot clearer now. Here, I take Darjeeling’s tank of choice, the Churchill Mk. VII, for a spin and blast enemies for a double kill. Because of turret inertia, limited ammunition and the presence of effective anti-tank weapons, tanks are no longer invincible monstrosities: I vividly recall Battlefield 1‘s FT-17 during the open beta, which was so overpowered that I went on a 21-streak with it. By comparison, the best kill-streak I’ve been on during this open beta was a more modest 9 with the Valentine Mk. III, and my Battlefield 1 record is a 13-streak.

  • Bolt-action rifles have taken a major reduction in effectiveness with center mass shots to the point where a body shot at range does around 55 damage (and 70 in close quarters). This is taking it a little far: raising their maximum damage to around 80-90, as per Battlefield 4 and having it trail out to 60 past 100 metres would make the rifles more powerful without decreasing the value of headshots. When headshots do connect with bolt-action rifles in Battlefield V, however, the results are incredibly satisfying.

  • It took me a little while to warm up to the progression system; weapons no longer need a currency to buy and unlock automatically once a class rank is reached. I immediately purchased the Gewehr 43 again and put the medium optics on it, as this configuration served me particularly well during the closed alpha. In fact, it was a little too effective, and for the beta, its vertical recoil was increased. Damage was also reduced slightly, but the weapon remains exceptionally effective.

  • A good set of optics on the Gewehr 43, and a healthy sense of caution means that with it, one can do very well at medium ranges. The trick is not to spam fire, and instead, place one’s shots more carefully. The skill ceiling for the Gewehr 43 makes the weapon a powerful all-around weapon, but during the beta, I saw many folks continue to run around with the StG 44, which has more recoil but otherwise remains superbly effective.

  • The support class was easily the weakest in Battlefield 1, but in Battlefield V, their machine guns gain the ability to penetrate soft cover like wood, and overall, the weapons are much more reliable at medium ranges. Playing support at close range is not viable like it was in Battlefield 3 and 4, where I ran around with the M249 and hip-fired like a madman, but with high accuracy at those medium ranges, one can consistently hit more distant targets than was possible with the LMGs from Battlefield 1.

  • My performance in Battlefield V has been consistently good from a KD perspective: in most Battlefield games, my lack of patience is the cause behind most of my deaths, and is only offset by the fact that I am very focused on objectives and team-oriented tasks, which earn enough points so that I can reach close to the top of the scoreboard despite a smaller number of kills. However, for Battlefield V, the attrition mechanics, and the advantages of a more cautious play-style means I adopt a defense-drive strategy, sticking around and fortifying a capture point until teammates arrive, and then capturing new points only with help.

  • The class-specific ranks return from Battlefield 1 and 3: in Battlefield V, class ranks unlock weapons, whereas in Battlefield 4, using a weapon class unlocked weapons. This system was a minor gripe I had with Battlefield 4, since it meant that weapon classes I rarely used, such as the marksman rifles, would be more difficult to unlock. By comparison, Battlefield 3 tied weapon unlocks with class usage, making it relatively simple to earn new weapons.

  • Ribbons in Battlefield V are still a bit of a mystery to me: while they must work similarly to how ribbons worked in previous Battlefield games, the criteria for unlocking them are not yet known. Here, I earn one ribbon for capturing points on Rotterdam, a map that is considered to be the Amiens of Battlefield V: an urban location with narrow streets, courtyards, a harbour and a rail bridge, it offers a bit of everything in terms of combat environments and each class is useful in its own right in different parts of the map.

  • After unlocking the Bren gun, I immediately gravitated towards it. Compared to the closed alpha, the Bren in the open beta has less recoil. While hitting for less damage per shot, its strength is accuracy, making it a solid weapon at medium ranges. Its main detriment is a lower firing rate, making it quite unsuitable for close quarters combat: during pinches where I encountered a medic or assault player up close, their Sten gun or StGs melted me after I got a few shots off.

  • Of course, against unsuspecting enemies at close range, the Bren is quite powerful, and inspection of my screenshots show that I am running with the AA sights. These unobtrusive sights make it much easier to aim the weapon at medium ranges, and a major benefit of a World War Two setting is that more weapon accessories can be used. There is a better selection of sights in the game that make it much easier to use many weapons; one of my weak points in Battlefield 1 was that I was ineffective with iron sights and so, I tend to avoid iron-sight weapons.

  • Bullet drop is much more noticeable in Battlefield V than it was in Battlefield 1: at ranges past 80 metres, one must begin compensating for gravity to land headshots on distant foes. Besides more pronounced bullet drop, the recon class of Battlefield V is also strongly affected by changes to the game mechanics. Spotting has been modified so that only the recon can spot enemies on the mini-map with their binoculars and flares. This increases their value in providing reconnaissance to their team. 3D-spotting is also absent, forcing players to visually recognise enemy soldiers.

  • Planes were left with a severe disadvantage with the changes in spotting, and while they’ve been given additional equipment to spot players on the ground for longer periods, other players have remarked that planes were much less effective. I had the chance to fly for a short period before going out of bounds and exploding for deserting: the planes handle more smoothly than they did in the alpha, but the small number of planes in the sky means dogfights are rare, and while I never tried for myself, strafing ground targets is also tricky. By comparison, tanks are very effective and enjoyable to use: here, I shell an enemy while trying to capture D point.

  • The FG-42 is a new addition to Battlefield V, being a high rounds-per-minute automatic rifle with a correspondingly high damage output and smaller magazine capacity. It is functionally similar to a battle rifle and in World War Two, was a limited production weapon intended for use by the Fallschirmjäger airborne infantry. Highly advanced for its time, the FG-42’s gas-operated mechanics influenced the systems used in the American M60.

  • German weapons of World War Two were among the most sophisticated in the world, and many of their elements made their way into modern weapon systems. The StG 44 is one of the most notable examples: the notion of firing intermediate cartridges in automatic combined the range of a rifle with the close-quarters efficacy of a submachine gun, and the StG 44 directly influenced the Avtomat Kalashnikova line of rifles, whose family and its derivatives have become the most widely-produced assault rifle in the world.

  • Without the blowing snow on Narvik, the map has a much cleaner feel to it and is reminiscent of some of Battlefield 1‘s In The Name of The Tsar maps. Volga River and Brusilov Keep were particularly enjoyable, and I became familiar enough with both maps to excel with all classes. This is my own metric for what makes a map fun: a well-designed map will allow all classes to be effective on it, featuring enough choke points, narrow corridors and open spaces so that players can choose their engagements and move in a more tactical manner to reach their destinations without a single class being dominant over others.

  • In both Battlefield V maps during the open beta, the only class I struggled with was the medic class and its submachine guns. Traditionally, I excel with these hip fire machines: PDWs were among my favourite weapons to run in Battlefield 3 and 4, and in Battlefield 1, submachine guns dominate my list of most-used weapons alongside the bolt-action rifles. For some reason, Battlefield V‘s submachine guns were not as effective in my hands, and this is probably because I became accustomed to playing at longer ranges.

  • We’re very nearly halfway into September by this point in time, and readers will have noted that I’ve got very few posts out. Besides a single post for Harukana Receive, and now, this post on Battlefield V, this blog’s been remarkably quiet. The reason for this is because circumstances in real life have led me to prioritise other things over blogging for the moment. For the first week of this month, I was in Winnipeg, Manitoba on work-related matters.

  • The work itself was quite challenging, but not from a technical perspective; every day left me exhausted. Even after I returned home, I’ve still been putting in non-standard hours and working on weekends in a bid to try and finish my assignment, and the end result of this is that I’ve been much more tired and dejected of late. Being of this mindset is certainly not conducive towards writing good blog posts, and I made an exception for Battlefield V‘s open beta because it was a welcome and enjoyable escape. While in Winnipeg, I was carrying my MacBook Pro; while a reliable and capable machine, it’s not capable of playing the shooters I typically partake in.

  • When things get challenging, I cope by breaking things down and taking everything one step at a time, as well as setting milestones to look forwards to. In Winnipeg, a good meal at the end of the day was that milestone. I am striving to conclude this project to the best of my ability and hope that there will be a bit of a breather before I return to my current work. Back in Battlefield V‘s open beta, towards the end, I figured out where weapon attachments could be added and so, put one of the sights on the StG 44. The result was a fun boost in performance that included a neat double kill here.

  • Having good sights is the difference between night and day, making it much easier to track targets. Of all the cosmetic changes, sights are the one that are worth looking into, since they directly affect one’s performance by helping improve visibility. Insofar, I’ve not seen anything to suggest that Battlefield V will have side grade style weapon attachments that positively impact performance in one area at the cost of another. The weapon tree gives weapons straight upgrades, which leaves players at a disadvantage.

  • Of course, with DICE pushing back the release date to November 20, there remains time to tune some concepts and features, so my final verdict on whether or not I’ll get the game will be made once I learn more about the final product. On the topic of release dates, Metro Exodus will be releasing in February 22, 2019, and DOOM: Eternal will be releasing somewhere in 2019. The Divison 2 will release on March 15, 2019, and there could be an open beta to try the game out come February 2019, as well.

  • Here, I wield the M1A1 carbine, which is a fast-firing semi-automatic rifle that deals less damage than the Gewehr 43 and is better suited for close quarters engagements than long range. It’s a bit of a fun weapon to use, and the high firing rate means it is more forgiving of missed shots in close range. In a few screenshots earlier, I fielded the ZH-29, a self-loading rifle that functions as a designated marksman rifle and can kill with two shots. This weapon is better suited for snipers who prefer a more aggressive role in capturing objectives and pushing alongside teammates, although it can hold its own in longer range engagements, as well.

  • The M1A1 is a variation of the M1 Carbine used by paratroopers and has a folding stock, and despite its designation, is unrelated to the famous M1 Garand. The M1 Garand is an iconic American service rifle widely used in World War Two, replacing the bolt-action M1903 in 1930 and used until the M14 was issued. With an eight-round clip, the weapon has a distinct pinging sound when the clip is ejected. Commonly portrayed in World War Two games, it would be quite surprising not to see this weapon in Battlefield V, and I am curious to see what DICE’s sound and animation engineers did for the weapon.

  • For me, the politics surrounding a video game do not have any influence on whether or not I will buy the game or enjoy it. While I consider myself moderately current with events around me, I feel that the various culture wars on the internet are not meritorious of consideration: life is much too short for one to be worried about taking sides in things that ultimately amount to nothing. The point of video games (and other forms of entertainment that often are scrutinised in culture wars) is to help folks relax, and so, I find that the worth of a game (and entertainment in general) is judged in how well it can help its audience relax and escape.

  • As a consequence, all of the debate surrounding the presence of female soldiers in Battlefield and unusual, steampunk-style customisations ends up being a waste of time. The merit of a game lies in how well it handles and whether or not it offers incentive to return. With this being said, I am of the mind that Battlefield V‘s marketing campaign was quite weak: Battlefield 1 managed to make me excited about the World War One setting, and a powerful campaign trailer ultimately helped make the decision to buy the game an easy one. Released on September 27, 2016, the trailer created a sense of respect and admiration for those who gave their lives in World War One.

  • The campaign trailer for Battlefield 1 was set to Really Slow Motion’s “Sun and Stars”, and with the end of September approaching, I am curious to see what kind of trailer Battlefield V has for its campaign. On the whole, Battlefield V‘s reveal trailer was the weakest, and newer trailers do create some excitement in the game for me. However, for most, first impressions matter, and DICE’s marketing team has struggled to recapture interest in the game following its disastrous reveal trailer.

  • Here, I call in the Allied equivalent of the Sturmtiger: this is the Churchill Crocodile, a heavy flame tank that featured a flamethrower in addition to its QF 75mm main gun. In Battlefield V, the flamethrower has a shorter range than the original tank’s 110m, and it is operated by a passenger. When I first called one in, it was moments away from the end of a losing game, and no one bothered to sit in the tank, but I managed to score some kills with it.

  • As far as major bugs go, Battlefield V still has an issue where the game may occasionally treat players as alive when they’re killed, and on one instance, I was unable to spawn back in, forcing me to quite and re-join the server. Beyond this, my experiences have been very smooth, and even on my computer, which is five-and-a-half years old now, the game still runs very well.

  • While sitting in the front gunner’s seat in a Tiger I tank, I somehow managed to blow up a light vehicle with the machine gun. While drivers are constrained by ammunition, secondary gunners have unlimited ammunition, making them powerful support for tank drivers: an observant secondary gunner can provide some covering fire for a driver while they are reloading or capturing a point.

  • Like the Battlefield 1 open beta, my best kill-streak was accomplished in the driver’s seat of a tank: it was the FT-17 in Battlefield 1, and in Battlefield V, it’s the Valentine Mk. VIII, an infantry tank that proved durable and reliable. The Mk VIII variant has a six-pounder, and in Battlefield V, it is quite manoeuvrable: I had no trouble in dispatching players who had flanked my tank with the aim of placing dynamite or AT mines, although the enemy team eventually brought Panzerfausts to the party, ending my streak at nine.

  • Towards the end of the game, I scored enough points to call in another Crocodile and single-handedly captured point B. I called in one V-1 rocket during one of my early matches to help clear a point on Rotterdam, but the close quarters environments and buildings make the V-1 (or the Allied counterpart, the JB-2) less effective than in the open spaces of Narvik. This brings my Battlefield V open beta post to a close: altogether, I spent around nine-and-a-half hours in the open beta and tried out many of the features. I did miss out on unlocking the M30 Drilling, a triple-barrel weapon with two shotgun barrels and one barrel for a rifle round. Overall, the beta was enjoyable, more so than Battlefield 1‘s, and if the launch is smooth, I may consider buying Battlefield V. For the near future, however, I will be returning my focus to anime, and the next post will be on Harukana Receive‘s penultimate episode this Friday.

While a step in the right direction, and being exciting for shaking up the way Battlefield plays, Battlefield V is still rough around the edges at present. The progression system is not as meaningful as it was in Battlefield 4 or 3, and some mechanics remain unimplemented even in this beta build (noticeably, the ability to drag downed teammates to a safer location before reviving them). It is unsurprising, then, that DICE has pushed back the release date for Battlefield V to November 20. This was a solid move on their part, as the extra time allows them to release a more polished, finished product over a broken one. From the open beta, there is much that needs to be improved on: besides a baffling progression system, the UI also needs improvement. Text is sometimes invisible, contrast is jarring in places, and the flash for earning an award or unlock is so bright that it can block out what I’m trying to shoot at. Time will tell whether or not Battlefield V will address these problems and put a rocky reveal beyond it: the gameplay itself is quite solid, and the World War Two setting has already provided many exciting possibilities for settings that could be explored. I’ve already spent many a match running the Miho Nishizumi and Darjeeling loadouts, as well as running around with Perrine’s Bren gun; it will be quite interesting to see what directions Battlefield V takes, and if the open beta was any indicator, the hit detection and performance does not seem to be an issue. Battlefield 4‘s launch was terrible, and it took a year for the game to stablise to the point where players deeply enjoyed it. If Battlefield V has a solid launch, with the ongoing release of content through the Tides of War, I imagine that there would be enough new content to enjoy that would make the price of admissions worthwhile, and that over time, I could acclimatise to the new progression system, even if it is not as sophisticated as the one I’ve come to enjoy in Battlefield 4 and 3. I’ve never been one to pre-order games, but as I did with Battlefield 1, my decision to pick up the game will be motivated largely by what I hear of its performance and gameplay post-launch — a Battlefield V that features solid gun-play and stable netcode will be one that I would be willing to shell out the full price for, as I am quite sure that I will get used to the new mechanics quite quickly and begin enjoying what is the closest we’ve ever had of a proper Strike Witches/Girls und Panzer game in the Frostbite Engine.

Battlefield V: Some remarks on authenticity and a personal wishlist following the closed alpha

“Every time someone tries to win a war before it starts, innocent people die. Every time.” –Steve Rogers, The Avengers: Age of Ultron

Battlefield V‘s first trailer was an ill-representation of the game, and a second trailer, showing paratroopers dropping into an icy village under an aurora, would better portray what Battlefield V was about: Battlefield is traditionally about battles and dynamic events at a large scale, so a trailer that focused on bombastic set-piece events naturally resulted in dissatisfaction. While the first trailer was a poor way to spark excitement about Battlefield V, online discussions immediately fixated on the presence of a female British soldier with a prosthetic arm, citing it as unrealistic and not being faithful to the aesthetic of the period, as well as the core of Battlefield itself. However, in their haste to mark Battlefield V as “unrealistic”, those of the opinion that Battlefield V should be “more realistic” are forgetting a key tenant of Battlefield – this series is known for providing an authentic military shooter experience, rather than a realistic one. The key difference is that something is authentic when it captures the sense of a time period or location, and realistic when it accurately reproduces a real-world occurrence. Since we can’t heal our wounds by standing beside a first aid kit, swim at full speed through frigid waters or magically continue reloading weapons at normal speed when struck in the arm, Battlefield can hardly be about realism. Instead, what Battlefield has excelled at is capturing the aesthetic of the conflicts the games depict, and since Battlefield began running in the Frostbite Engine, the visuals and environments are stunning. From uniforms, to vehicles, equipment and weapons, the team at DICE faithfully reproduces the appearance, details and sound for each piece of kit. These elements immerse players into their game, and is one of the key draws about Battlefield – a Battlefield title that can properly capture the era it is set in and features solid, skill-based and enjoyable gameplay is a winner in my books.

We’ve previously considered gameplay mechanics and aspects of a good progression system that would make Battlefield V enjoyable. With authenticity in mind, this post will also detail some of my wishlist of content that Battlefield V should feature, especially with regard to weapons and the different theatres of war that the game will cover. Battlefield V has dispensed with the premium model and will be releasing content chronologically, so after release, the first maps and campaign stories will be focused around the earlier stages of World War Two. Besides the Norwegian Campaign (April to June 1940) that featured during the closed alpha, promotional artwork also shows that the Battle of Rotterdam, tanks rolling through the French countryside and conflict in North Africa. It would appear that Battlefield V is going with a variety of lesser-known, but nonetheless important, battles of World War Two in its presentation thus far, similar to Battlefield 1. However, as Battlefield 1 also depicted some well-known battles, it stands to reason that Battlefield V should do the same. Moreover, because the African theatre is featured in addition to the European theatre, one could also reasonably expect that some conflicts in the Pacific and Asian theatres would also be present once more content is added: in particular, it would be interesting to see DICE’s take on Iwo Jima, Okinawa, the Liberation of Hong Kong and even island-hopping campaigns, both as part of the single-player and multiplayer. There is, simply put, a great deal of content and battles Battlefield V could cover: my personal interest lies largely with the Pacific Theatre, and with the Frostbite Engine, this could bring modern visuals and mechanics into a theatre not explored since the days of Call of Duty: World at War (2008) and Medal of Honour: Rising Sun (2003).

Screenshots and Commentary

  • This post features the last set of screenshots from my time in the Battlefield V closed alpha, which ended a shade more than a month ago. My feats in this post are not as impressive as those of the earlier post, but are nonetheless fun moments that I had while going through the closed alpha. This late in the game, I finally got the hang of the Bren Gun and was stepping on anyone who dared to step onto my capture points.

  • In one match, I spawned in as a squad leader and was doing so well, I had accumulated enough points to call in a V-1 strike. I targetted the town, where I knew friendly players were trying to defend the capture point, and moments later, the missile flew in. I had originally intended to watch the V-1 impact and detonate – the explosion is spectacular. However, while waiting, I had become unmindful of my surroundings, and another player ended up killing me while the missile hit. I got a double kill out of it, but the moment was not particularly worthy of a screenshot, so here we are, with me immediately after calling in the strike.

  • I’ve not placed too much focus on the following topic because it is trivial for me, but a great deal of vitriol was directed towards the inclusion of a female British soldier sporting a prosthetic arm in the first reveal trailer. Critics argued that this was indicative of an industry kowtowing to factions who feel that political correctness must be integrated into all games as a concession to inclusivity and diversity. This fear stems from an online culture war on journalism and gaming four years ago, and there is a concern that as a consequence, games (especially shooters) would prioritise dubious messages, political correctness, forced diversity and banal narratives over gameplay and immersion.

  • A world where such games dominate the market would look as follows: the only “games” that would exist would be written in the Twine Engine and feature next to nothing in gameplay, or else be shoddily thrown together by people with only the faintest understanding of how game engines work. The end result is non-existent gameplay, where individuals are forced to navigate a labyrinthine set of HTML cards featuring no plausible options while listening to repetitive piano music, or else deal with a frustratingly inconsistent grid-based combat system that shows the game was developed with a political message, rather than enjoyment, in mind. If games like these were the only ones on the market, gaming as a whole would collapse.

  • Fortunately, this has not occurred. There is a vast selection of enjoyable games being made, and so as long as gameplay and immersion remain at the forefront of development, one could not so readily say that culture wars have diminished gaming, and the individuals using these culture wars to get their foot in the door have certainly not succeeded, nor can they consider themselves as game developers: the Twine Engine is so informal that individuals wanting to do so can put a set of hyper-card style presentations together, add some music and pass that off as a game without ever understanding classes, inheritance, polymorphism, and the other things that proper developers need to learn.

  • The short of things is that political correctness has not negatively impacted games to any real capacity, so people should 1) stop trying to continue to push this and 2) stop trying to claim that it has. Battlefield V looks quite promising, and I’m more interested in seeing what other weapons there will be in the game: besides the host of LMGs and MMGs that Witches run with, the increased presence of semi-automatic rifles will be interesting, and the era means that there will be a much greater range of weapon modifications and attachments to hopefully choose from. While the closed alpha did not show weapon customisation, I am hoping that Battlefield 3 and 4‘s system makes a return.

  • Besides weapons and vehicles, the biggest thing on my mind is which theatres of war Battlefield V will choose to depict. The game is set to release the different periods chronologically, so it makes sense if the different content updates were all based on period events. If this is true, then what we’re likely to see in October is the Fall of Europe, where the Axis powers swept across the continent and pushed the Allied forces to the brink in 1940. The Dunkirk Evacuation happened at this point in time, although the British also managed to repel the Luftwaffe’s in the Battle of Britain, slowing Hitler’s plans for a land invasion.

  • In 1941, Hitler began Operation Barbarossa with the intent of invading and defeating Russia, and in December, Japan bombed Pearl Harbour, prompting America to enter the war. If Battlefield V depicts the attack on Pearl Harbour, it would mark a first since Pearl Harbour was visited in 2003’s Medal of Honour: Pacific Assault. This is unlikely, since there was no infantry combat during the attack. Instead, the fall of Hong Kong could be shown if DICE is going for lesser-known battles – on the same morning of the attack on Pearl Harbour, Japan also invaded Hong Kong, and in a battle lasting 17 days, Allied forces were defeated.

  • The second update would probably include battles from Operation Barbarossa and conflicts in the Pacific with the Japanese offensives, so besides Hong Kong, the Invasion of Thailand, Wake Island and the Philippines Campaign could be a major part of things. Should DICE go in this direction, it would take a contemporary shooter somewhere that had not been explored for some fifteen years, and would certainly make Battlefield V stand apart. I’ve heard that the upgrades will add campaign missions in addition to multiplayer content, which is exciting.

  • 1942 saw fierce battles in North Africa, where British General Montgomery routed the German-Italian forces at the Battle of El Alamein, and the Russians began beating back German forces at Stalingrad. In 1943, Mussolini’s Italy collapsed, so I imagine that the third major update will involve Africa and Italian campaigns. I was initially not a big fan of desert maps in Battlefield 1, but having spent more time becoming familiar with the game mechanics, I now perform reasonably consistently across all maps, so desert maps no longer bother me.

  • As we enter 1944, the Allies prepared for the full-scale invasion of Europe. This is where players might see the Normandy landings of D-Day in the full glory of the Frostbite Engine. Besides D-Day, Paris is also liberated in 1944, and the Battle of the Bulge occurred, as well. Because armour combat became much more widespread in World War Two, it would be interesting to feature a game mode where players could spawn into tanks and slug it out in a map. Battlefield 3 featured tank superiority, which heavily emphasised armoured combat: this game mode could be modified to work in Battlefield V, and would represent the closest players come to playing Dream Tank Match, albeit a superior version running in the Frostbite Engine.

  • The final stages of World War Two involved the Allied forces crossing the Rhine River, the Battle of Berlin and campaigns in the Pacific to capture Japanese islands ahead of the proposed land invasion, including Iwo Jima and Okinawa. Just looking through World War Two, there is simply so much content that could be featured in Battlefield V, and the continuous service model, as well as the removal of premium means that there is no limit to what Battlefield V could do. My expectation is that Battlefield V will cover World War Two very broadly and depict some lesser-known battles in more detail in addition to major campaigns, similarly to how Battlefield 1 depicted World War One.

  • Operations and Conquest were the best modes of Battlefield 1 – I expect that Grand Operations and Conquest will be the most enjoyable modes in Battlefield V, as well. Having spent nearly two hundred hours in Battlefield 1 since I bought the game, I play conquest nearly exclusively, with some domination, operations and team death-match in between. War pigeons and rush never really worked for me. If Battlefield V had grand operations, shock operations, conquest, domination, team death-match, armoured warfare and gun master as game modes, a total of seven, this would be more than enough to keep me happy.

  • I have a particular fondness for gun master because it forces players to really understand the weapons they’re using, and ultimately, tested their skills by pushing them to get kills with difficult-to-use weapons in order to win the game. It gives players a chance to try out weapons and setups that they normally might not run with, as well. I imagine that Battlefield 1 dispensed with this mode because of a relative lack of weapons to make the mode viable.

  • Battlefield 1 had a plethora of melee weapons grouped into categories with different properties. Through normal play, one could unlock melee weapons from each category, and more illustrious weapons needed to be unlocked through assignments or accumulating puzzle pieces. This approach is one aspect of Battlefield 1 that worked: one could get everything they needed to be effective just by playing the game, and then anyone who wanted more could work on assignments to unlock new melee weapons that, while aesthetically different, were functionally equivalent. Finally, some weapons could only be unlocked with puzzle pieces. If Battlefield V works in a similar manner, with unlockable and pay-only melee weapons, this would be fantastic with me.

  • I’ve mentioned frequently that game mechanics, particularly gunplay and hit detection reliability, will be key factors in deciding whether or not I buy Battlefield V. Here, I add that how microtransactions will be handled is also important: I ended up completely skipping over Battlefront II because progression was slow to the point of requiring payment in order to advance, and the lootbox debacle showed a game that did not let players invest time into it. If Battlefield V can create a proper progression system where exotic costumes, helmets, weapon skins and melee weapons can be purchased specifically without random chance, and these items do not affect gameplay, then it would show that a full-fledged game can also use and encourage microtransactions without impacting the core game.

  • This is why I will not pre-order Battlefield V, and instead, will stick to the same approach that I did for Battlefield 1 – if the game proves itself worthy after launch, then I will buy it. I’ve heard that DICE is also working on their own Battle Royale game. The idea of a Frostbite-powered Battle Royale could be interesting, since the engine is already highly sophisticated and suited for large-scale battles. With smooth performance, re-adjusted weapon balance and properly designed maps, a World War Two Battle Royale game in Frostbite could set itself apart from existing Battle Royale games and offer players something new.

  • With this being said, I personally have no interest in Battle Royale whatsoever: I’ve previously outlined in Sword Art Online Alternative that I am an impatient gamer, prefering to jump right back into the gameplay after dying. I have no qualms with DICE exploring this direction, but only if the development of a Battle Royale comes not at the detriment of the core Battlefield V experience.

  • It is likely that Battlefield V‘s open beta will become available on September 4, a month from now, given the timing of the Road to Battlefield V events. At present, the third and final part of Road to Battlefield V is running: they’ve reduced the unlock score for the weekly rewards, and with twenty thousand points for each stage, rather than thirty thousand, completing the assignments has taken around half an hour less altogether. I’m hoping that a different map will be featured for the open beta, and that there will be a bit of time to sit down and give it a go.

  • With this, I’ve exhausted my collection of Battlefield V closed alpha screenshots, so if I do decide to write about Battlefield, I will be returning to write about Battlefield 1. A few days ago, DICE released their summer update for Battlefield 1 which brought in some new UI changes, a bolt-action mode for the M1903 Experimental and an update to the minimap that shows the radius of allied spot flares. Battlefield 1 has had a solid run, and even with the naysayers saying it was a dead game a year ago, I’ve not had too much trouble finding servers to get into. Whether or not I’ll do a swan song post for Battlefield 1 will largely depend on my schedule, but for now, there is going to be one more post lined up, dealing with the Violet Evergarden OVA, which released a month ago.

Of course, these are merely my thoughts on what Battlefield V could include: while the marketing campaign was a failure in capturing hype on the game, the closed alpha helped salvage some interest, and the new update models mean that as Battlefield V progresses through its life cycle, there could be some exciting developments that await players. With this being said, there is still the matter of the open beta that will provide players with a better idea of what Battlefield V will be like overall, and my own decision to buy the game will largely be based on how well things handle in the open beta, as well as any new developments (e.g. trailers, concept art, announcements, etc) that are released as the launch date comes. It’s not in my nature to make a call purely based on prevailing sentiment in the community – a bad marketing campaign might dissuade interest in the game, but at the end of the day, what matters most in a game is simply the fun factor and immersion. A game with good mechanics and good authenticity will satisfy both criterion, while games lacking these aspects are less likely to excite me, and controversy usually does not influence my decisions in buying things unless it is directly related to gameplay. So far, those with the opinion that political agendas have permeated modern gaming have yet to be proven correct: until the day comes where games are written exclusively in the Twine Engine and force players to type their emotions while they play the game, I contend that gaming is in a fine state, and in the case of Battlefield V, I would certainly pick the game up if the open beta and subsequent promotional materials impress where the first reveal trailer did not.

Yoshika Miyafuji and the Frostbite Engine, or, Strike Witches: Road to Berlin and The Road to Battlefield V

“Hikari Karibuchi was able to take out a Neuroi Hive in the Arctic cold! With a Liberator pistol!”
“Well, I’m sorry. I’m not Hikari Karibuchi.”

—Obadiah Stane and a scientist on miniaturising the Arc Reactor, Iron Man

Earlier this week, it was announced that Strike Witches would return the story to Yoshika Miyafuji and the 501ˢᵗ Joint Fighter Wing. In a thrilling trailer, Yoshika and her fellow Witches deploy from the bomb bays of a B-17 Flying Fortress into the countryside below. They are immediately surrounded by a Neuroi swarm vastly outnumbering the swarms seen in the movie, beginning a fierce engagement. The trailer closes with a distraught Yoshika resolving to protect everyone. Set for release in 2020, this marks the triumphant return of the 501ˢᵗ, after Brave Witches followed Hikari Karibuchi’s time in St. Petersburg: it’s the first time we’ve seen Yoshika and her friends take to the skies since the Operation Victory Arrow OVAs, marking a welcome return to the familiar Witches that really kicked things off. With the likes of Strike Witches The Movie and Operation Victory Arrow setting the precedent for what Strike Witches can potentially cover, expectations are high: while Strike Witches‘ first two seasons were best known for their weekly enemies and flimsy excuses to stare at pantsu (which is unsurprisingly and, should remain, illegal in all jurisdictions outside the realm of fiction), The Movie began developing a deeper narrative about what being a Witch meant, and Operation Victory Arrow explored different aspects of new technology, the strength of resolve when one is fighting for their homeland and how trust is lost and gained. These substantial changes in Strike Witches gave the series a new meaning and the possibility to explore a world that had been surprisingly well-developed and detailed, for a series that was once meant to provide gratuitous pantsu moments. Thus, when Brave Witches came and continued to hone this pattern, crafting a meaningful and engaging story with new characters, it became clear that the world of Strike Witches definitely could stand on its own and explore a wide range of interesting themes. As a result, when we turn the story back to the 501ˢᵗ, expectations are high for this group of Witches to impress and make the most of their world to create a compelling narrative.

Although the date seems quite far off, being 2020, there are a few factors that make this timeline much more palatable. For one, this new Strike Witches series, titled Strike Witches: Road to Berlin, is going to be a televised broadcast, which corresponds with a concrete timeline of when audiences will be able to watch this; Girls und Panzer: Das Finale has no known timeline, and so, could conclude in 2023 at the current rate of progression. The Witches’ deployment from a B-17 Flying Fortress also seems to resemble the Narvik Grand Operations opening cinematic, where British Paratroopers make a jump onto the battlefield. Readers wondering why this post has all of the metadata tags and title of a Battlefield V post have their question answered here: Battlefield V returns players to the World War Two setting, and Strike Witches is set in an alternate-history version of World War Two. Alluded to in my previous post, the shared setting means that players who also happen to enjoy Strike Witches will finally be able to run with some of their favourite Strike Witches loadouts in the Frostbite Engine. Moreover, with a powerful new customisation system projected for Battlefield V, I imagine that players could fine-tune weapons, and even cosmetic features, so that they can more closely resemble their favourite Witch should they be inclined to make a purchase for those items. This aspect of Battlefield V has drawn a considerable amount of flak and will be the subject of a discussion for another day; at present, I am content to simply run with the same weapons and setup as the Witches of Strike Witches, and believe that it will be necessary to learn more about the customisation system before attempting to run around as Lynette Bishop, Gertrude Barkhorn, Georgette Lemare or Nikka Katajainen.

Screenshots and Commentary

  • In this post, I will be mixing talk of Battlefield V with talk about Strike Witches: my story with Strike Witches dates back some seven and a half years, when I picked up the first season out of curiosity. Those I knew recommended against watching the anime on reputation alone, but once I got into Strike Witches, I found a simple and modestly entertaining series during its first season. The second season was more or less a carbon copy of the first, merely being set in a different setting and also began exploring the limits of magic.

  • Here, I give the German MP-40 a go: an open-bolt, blowback-operated submachine gun firing 9×19 mm Parabellum rounds at 500-550 RPM, giving the medic class a viable close-quarters weapon. Battlefield 1‘s medics were largely relegated to medium range combat, and only had the Federov Avtomat as a closer range weapon. This is contrary to the medic’s role of being in closer ranges to heal and revive teammates. One interesting tidbit about the MP-40 is that Battlefield V‘s soldier is holding it correctly: holding the magazine itself could move the magazine out of position, causing the weapon to stop firing.

  • With a selection of submachine guns and semi-automatic rifles available to the medic, this class will become much more versatile and useful now. I believe in Strike Witches: The Movie, Erica Hartmann also holds her MP-40 in the correct manner, gripping the weapon closer to the magazine housing. While typically rolling with the MG42, as Gertrude and Minna does, she switches over to the MP-40 after her MG42’s barrel overheats mid-combat.

  • Running with a proper Karlsland Witch loadout in the finished Battlefield V will largely depend on how the game treats the MG42: this general purpose machine gun could be configured as either an LMG or medium machine guns. Since Battlefield V chooses to balance MMGs by making soldiers unable to aim down sights unless they have their bipods deployed, I did not utilise the MG34 to any real extent during the closed alpha, and a MMG configured MG42 would force players to adopt a more defensive style. Conversely, an LMG-configured MG42 would allow for players to play as aggressively as do the Karlsland Witches.

  • By comparison, bolt-action rifles are much rarer in Strike Witches: the anime allows the Witches to carry heavy arsenals without effort on virtue of their magic, so they can carry heavier weapons into combat, including the Type 99 cannon and Boys Anti-Tank Rifle. Running an authentic Lynette Bishop loadout, then, is impossible, since the mechanics of Battlefield V are such that heavier weapons would necessarily be mounted. However, this isn’t going to stop anyone from being effective with the bolt-action rifles and semi-automatic rifles: I managed to land consecutive kills here with the Karabiner 98k while defending a point.

  • While my performance at the start of the closed alpha was quite poor, once I became accustomed to moving around more slowly, with squad-mates, and chose to play a more defensive game, things turned around dramatically, to the point where KD ratios exceeding 1.5 became the norm. Battlefield V has gone the extra mile to encourage a more tactical play-style: by deliberately limiting players’ ammunition capacity, this prevents camping, while the shorter time to kill encourages a more defensive play-style that is far removed from the aggressive swarming tactics that worked so well in Battlefield 1.

  • The end result is that a shorter time to kill and reduced ammunition capacity forces players to move strategically, picking the best times to press forward and attack, or else defend a position. Things are much more skill driven, and this will hopefully result in much more consistency in one’s experience: it only took me around five hours to get comfortable with Battlefield V‘s approach, whereas with Battlefield 1, I am forced to accommodate for random factors that impact my gunplay.

  • Even though the sweet spot is completely removed from Battlefield V, I nonetheless found sniping to be superbly enjoyable: close to the alpha’s end, I was nailing back-to-back kills one enemies. By this point in time in Battlefield 1, I’ve largely stopped playing within my rifles’ sweet spots when running as a scout: the Enfield Silenced is a superior all-around weapon and aiming for the head will ensure a one-hit kill regardless of the sweet spot.

  • I speculate that Road to Berlin will likely deal with the Human-Neuroi War’s later stages: in World War Two, the Allied forces’ assault on Berlin marked the closing stages of the war, and in Strike Witches, we’ve seen the equivalent of The Battle of Britain in the first season, and the Liberation of France during the second season. With Nazi Germany being the final part of the war, it stands to reason that Road to Berlin will see some of the fiercest fighting seen in Strike Witches to date. The trailer certainly seems to suggest this: the sheer number of Neuroi on screen far surpasses anything seen previously, even in The Movie.

  • While the closed alpha saw players running around in the frozen hills of Narvik, Battlefield V has also showcased concept art of other locations, including Northern France, Rotterdam, Arnhem (so, players will get to recreate the Battle of Arnhem in the Frostbite Engine and play as Perrine), and North Africa (fans of the 31ˢᵗ Joint Fighter Squadron Afrika will rejoice). This is particularly exciting, and in some of the more open maps, such as amidst the rolling hills and sleepy villages of France, it might be possible for some heavy armoured combat to take place.

  • Bringing the sort of tank combat that ought to have been seen in World of Tanks and Girls und Panzer: Dream Tank Match will be one of the other things I’m looking forwards to seeing in Battlefield V: even if the scale of the tank battles are smaller, the fact is that the Frostbite Engine is incredibly sophisticated and in previous iterations of Battlefield, tank combat has been quite satisfying.

  • The new mechanics of tank combat in Battlefield V forces tankers to play more strategically: much like how infantry carry less ammunition, tanks now have a finite pool of shells for their main cannon and secondary machine guns.  Reloading is a slow and nerve-wracking process, leaving tankers exposed to enemy action. As such, it is no longer viable to shell buildings to the ground, or camp in some remote corner of the map and pick off distant foes. One must make every shot count, but when rounds connect, they are devastating.

  • Going purely from my impressions of armoured warfare in the closed alpha and how tanks are quite fragile against Panzerfaust rounds, the Daigensui-ryu is utterly worthless in Battlefield V: charging into an urban area without any infantry support will doom any tank, even the mighty Tiger I. This individual’s infamy has passed into the realm of obscurity now: five years previously, they’d been reviled for starting a brutal flame war arguing that Black Forest’s practices in Girls und Panzer were a proper display of the school’s skill, and Shiho’s preparedness to disown Miho was justified.

  • With the revelation that Shiho cares very much for her daughters despite her outward appearances, it is quite clear that the old flame wars amounted to little more than a waste of time. Supplementary materials further show that Shiho is a good parent, but struggles to make her feelings known. So, she hides her doubts behind a veneer of toughness. I watched the flame war from the sidelines at the time, since I was entangled in trying to finish my honours thesis program at the time, and looking back, I believe that Shiho’s inability to make her feelings clear could give the impression that she’s cold and unyielding.

  • While I may espouse that Battlefield V is Girls und Panzer: Dream Tank Match as it should have been, featuring much more dynamic and skill-driven gameplay, a part of me wishes that they would port Dream Tank Match over to the PC. However, I imagine that Dream Tank Match will release for PC the same way Half-Life 3 will release for PC, so having DICE bring new stories of World War Two into life in their engine is more than a satisfactory substitution: it’s like losing a dime and finding a dollar. I’m glad that Battlefield V will be exploring some of the lesser-known battles of the Second World War, and in a later post, I will be dropping by with the last batch of closed alpha screenshots and my own wishlist of what I hope Battlefield V will have in terms of content.

  • The Bren gun in the closed alpha was a mixed bag: initially, I struggled to perform with the Bren because of its low rate of fire and longer time to ADS. This meant I was losing firefights frequently, trying to use the gun in a way that it was not meant to be used. However, once I got the hang of it, I began playing more defensively, hanging back and picking off enemies at range while providing suppressive fire for allies, and the Bren became a powerhouse weapon that I went on several killstreaks with.

  • The Bren is yet another weapon that illustrates that with enough time, one could get used to a weapon and its mechanics to get more out of it: by the end of the closed alpha, I was tearing apart enemies with the weapon between the Bravo and Delta capture points in conquest, using my ammo pouches to help teammates resupply, and building up fortifications to provide our positions with more cover. While the fortification system is useful and fun, one of the things I did not see in the closed alpha was the ability to build a snowman for bonus morale points.

  • The Bren’s slower firing rate and unwieldy iron sights might make it a bit of a challenge to use at extreme close quarters, but at some ranges, it is possible to hipfire the weapon and score kills with it. In order to run with Perrine’s Arnhelm Bridge loadout, I would also need to have a PIAT handy. Because of the class system, it may or may not be possible to pull this off, since the PIAT is an anti-tank weapon and likely to be made available to the anti-vehicular archetype for the assault class. American-made Bazookas might also be available as a viable anti-vehicle weapon, and looking through inventories of World War Two-era anti-tank weapons, the list is extensive.

  • This post was largely written about Strike Witches: Road to Berlin, and before I wrap up, I’ll explain where the page quote is sourced from – I’ve been doing some catch-up with some of the MCU movies that I did not watch previously, by beginning with 2007’s Iron Man. During one point in the movie, while tasking his scientists to replicate the Arc Reactor, Obadiah Stane yells at the lead scientist at their lack of progress. The page quote, then, is a modified variant of the quote: I was most impressed with how Brave Witches handled their Neuroi Hive fight, being a true example of teamwork and resourcefulness. As a result, Yoshika and her fellow Witches have a rather tall order ahead of them – they must put on an equally good showing without resorting to the ridiculous antics that were seen at the end of seasons one and two when the 501ˢᵗ took out their hives.

  • The ribbon system was very inconsistent in the closed alpha, and I imagine that ribbon criteria will likely be tuned before the final release. Here, I earn one for resupplying team mates, and with this final screenshot, my part-Strike Witches-part-Battlefield V closed alpha talk comes to a close. I’m sure that readers might be disappointed to learn that this post has no screenshots of Road to Berlin, but I do have a stockpile of Battlefield V closed alpha screenshots to make use of, and a post talking about Strike Witches with five screenshots would not be too exciting, either. Upcoming posts are less likely to disappoint readers – I am going to write about the second Yuru Camp△ OVA very soon, having recently watched it, and there’s also Harukana Receive‘s second episode to look at, as well.

The Battlefield V closed alpha provided a fine opportunity to run around with some of the weapons that will feature in Battlefield V; the time to kill at present is very low, and with semi-automatic weapons having next to no spread, their laser-like precision at range creates an interesting challenge in which semi-automatic weapons become sufficiently powerful to dominate gameplay. The Gewehr 43 and StG 44 in semi-automatic mode are so versatile that they may render the other weapons obsolete if not properly balanced. Fortunately, there is a solution: adding increased recoil to semi-automatic weapons forces players to learn their pattern without requiring changing spread and damage mechanics. Skill-based shooters are largely built around recoil control, so if Battlefield V can stick with modifying recoil patterns and modifiers, as well as reload times, for different weapons without affecting damage, then each weapon will have a consistent behaviour that one can learn over time. Mastering these patterns confer improved experiences over time and also provides an incentive to better oneself: there is a sense of accomplishment when games reward players for taking the time to learn their mechanics. Players who invest the time in learning their weapons and archetypes will help their team substantially and may also bring about more Only in Battlefield™ moments that make the best titles of the series so captivating to play. Similarly, in Strike Witches, Yoshika started out as a bit of a joke, but her persistence and determination to do right in the name of her friends and duty led her to become a hero of sorts. With at least a year-and-a-half between the present and Strike Witches: Road to Berlin‘s release, I imagine that there will be a sufficient amount of time to go into Battlefield V and unlock all of the necessary weapons and equipment needed to run with the same, or at least, a very similar loadout as their favourite Witch.

Battlefield V: Initial impressions of the closed alpha

“I can’t change the direction of the wind, but I can adjust my sails to always reach my destination.” –Jimmy Dean

This is probably a post that none of my readers were expecting and comes out of the blue: a few days ago, I received an email from EA with an invite code to the Battlefield V closed alpha. The intent of this closed alpha is to provide players with an idea of how Battlefield V‘s new mechanics handle, as well as for developers to gather data on performance and usage statistics. Unlike previous closed alphas, Battlefield V‘s closed alpha has no NDAs in place, and so, I’m allowed to share screenshots of my experiences. Returning to the World War II period, Battlefield V was marketed as being completely unlike its predecessors: the attrition mechanic was introduced alongside fortifications that favours slower, tactical play over run-and-gun tactics. After I finished pre-loading the closed alpha, I dropped into a match of conquest. My team was behind, but after I learned my way around the medic’s Gewehr 43, I began healing and reviving every teammate in reach. We eventually came back from our deficit to win that match, and in this moment, it became obvious that classic Battlefield conquest had returned in full – tickets count down, and more importantly, holding a majority of the flags will bleed the other team of tickets. In this manner, a well-coordinated team can mount comebacks that make conquest a particularly fun game mode: this was largely absent in Battlefield 1, but makes a welcome return in Battlefield V. With a default ticket count of 800, matches last roughly half an hour, which is perfect for my schedule. Battlefield 1‘s conquest lacked the same excitement and relied on Behemoths as an unsuccessful comeback mechanic, but matches were consistently half an hour in length. The return of classic conquest with a reasonable ticket count means that conquest is now much more exciting, while at the same time, fitting with my schedule. However, there’s much more to Battlefield V than just conquest, and here, I explore some of the things in Battlefield V that are fantastic, and things that need work before the completed title can release.

Firing the semi-automatic Gewehr 43 carbine at distant foes and scoring my first kill of the closed alpha highlights one of the most important change Battlefield V makes to gunplay. Random bullet deviation is gone, and weapons are now consistent in how they fire. Semi-automatic and single-fire weapons are as precise as their users, and automatic weapons have a recoil pattern that can be mastered. Without random chance affecting firefights, the outcomes of an engagement boil down to skill alone now: powerful semi-automatic weapons meant that in the closed alpha, I found the Gewehr 43 a superb all-around weapon for the arctic fjord map in Norway. Suppression has also been reworked to be purely visual, so players under fire can still return accurate fire and potentially win a firefight if they are skilful enough. Having guns that handle differently, but reliably means that different weapons will suit different players. This will hopefully encourage players to try a wide range of loadouts to find ones that work best for them, giving incentive to unlock different weapons and equipment. The attrition mechanic is also a welcome addition to Battlefield – players can no longer regenerate their health fully after a firefight and only start with limited ammunition. To remain effective, one must stick with one’s squad and know the map well: health and ammunition is acquired from allied players and resupply crates scattered at important locations around the map. Supporting one’s team with healing, revives, resupplies and spotting becomes even more important than it did previously: a lone wolf player simply won’t last long, and players can no longer toss grenades on a whim. However, resupplying, healing and reviving are no longer easy actions. There’s a delay in carrying them out, forcing players to assess a situation, deciding whether or not they should go for ammunition or reviving a downed teammate. While perhaps starting players with a little less ammo than I’d like, attrition slows play down and promotes careful, strategic play. Destruction and fortification also changes the way Battlefield handles; it is now possible to undo destruction or else modify areas to give allies an advantage, while forcing enemy players to re-evaluate their next move carefully. Overall, Battlefield V is a slower experience: I died frequently treating the game like Battlefield 1, but when I slowed down to support teammates and defend capture points, things became much more fun. In particular, the medic class has benefitted from the changes and has come back in a big way for Battlefield V: this is much welcomed, allowing me to pick off distant enemies, then retreat to cover so I could heal and revive teammates.

Because we’re still early in Battlefield V‘s testing, the closed alpha also revealed numerous technical limitations that will need to be ironed out before launch. My client crashed on several occasions, and a system report indicated that I’d run out of RAM. Memory leaks and CPU consumption will definitely need to be addressed: the game largely runs smoothly at 60 FPS, but when I spawn in over-the-shoulder onto a squadmate, the frame-rate dips to 30 FPS. This lag has occasionally costed me: I died instantly because I could not move to respond to a threat. I’ve heard that the snow effects are all computed: the EA Play build of Battlefield V was particularly bad for it, and while toned down for the closed alpha, there were moments where performance became an issue. I vividly recall being killed by a guy that had looked like he was behind a wall, but had moved before the client could update it. Besides optimising performance, Battlefield V‘s movement system is nowhere nearly as smooth as it was previously. Vaulting over ledges is very clunky; some surfaces that should be easy to jump over were not passable, and it was common to get stuck in the level geometry. By comparison, players move like a dream in Battlefield 1. The new spotting system is also tricky: the only way to mark enemies on the minimap now is with the scout’s monocular, and hitting “Q” simply marks a spot on the ground. As a result, enemies are nearly invisible in their environment and can pick off other players uncontested. A system where hitting “Q” marks enemies’ last known location on the minimap, followed with a spotting animation, would be more visceral without making it too easy to hunt down enemies, as with earlier Battlefield titles. The UI still needs work so it appears in the right places, with the right feedback (it sometimes disappears after I’ve been killed) and also so it intuitively works for players (in my first half-hour, I did not know it was possible to switch back over to the classic map spawning system). Finally, physics and state related bugs must be addressed: I once spawned in with no weapons in hand, and another time, phased through the ground when I died and could not bleed out or be revived. These bugs are hilarious now, but will quickly become frustrating if not addressed for production.

Screenshots and Commentary

  • Following the EA Play event, where attendees were able to try out Battlefield V for themselves and capture footage of the gameplay, other members of the Battlefield community were interested to try the game out for themselves on their own computers. After the announcement of the closed alpha, a small number of Battlefield players were invited, myself included. I note immediately that I’m running the closed alpha on a computer with an i5 3570k, 16 GB of RAM and an EVGA GTX 1060 SC. Performance for the most part is smooth, save for moments when the snow becomes too much or when I spawn back in over the shoulder of a squadmate. For this post, I feature some of my earlier screenshots of me getting a feel for Battlefield V – I will be showcasing some of my more impressive moments in a future post: while I was off to a rough start, by the last few days of the closed alpha, I was consistently scoring a positive KD ratio.

  • The Bren Gun is an iconic World War II light machine gun: developed after World War I ended, the Bren is a magazine-fed, gas-operated LMG firing .303 rounds at 500-520 RPM. Despite its cumbersome design, the weapon was reliable and counted as quite effectual. It’s also the weapon of choice for Strike Witches‘ Perrine H. Clostermann: in Battlefield 1, I ran with the Madsen MG as a stand-in, but with World War II being Battlefield V‘s setting, I will have a chance to run with authentic Strike Witches loadouts now. In Battlefield V, the Bren is a little unwieldy but hits reasonably hard when properly used.

  • The mountain village of Narvik is an absolutely beautiful setting, featuring both long range and close quarters combat. The real town of Narvik was the site of several battles in World War II for its strategic importance, and after Nazi Germany captured the port town in the opening stages of the Norwegian Campaign, Allied forces attempted to dislodge the defending German forces. They dominated the German naval forces, but were ill-equipped to deal with the dug-in Germans. Battlefield V recreates this experience – in Grand Operations, players will play as the attacking British forces or the defending German forces.

  • Because Battlefield V takes away random bullet deviation, tap-firing once again becomes viable, allowing the assault rifles to reach out further in their effectiveness. Here, I use the StG 44, the German automatic rifle that would form the basis for all modern assault rifles. Designed in 1942, it fired 7.92 x 33 mm Kurtz rounds at 550-600 RPM and had a detachable box magazine. Its automatic fire makes it effective at close ranges, and at longer ranges, tap-firing allows one to hit distant targets reliably. The StG 44 in Battlefield V pulls to the right and up slightly when firing, so with time, players could accommodate for this recoil and even hit distant targets while firing on full automatic.

  • The medic class can equip the Gewehr 43, equipped with a ZF4 4-power optic. This semi-automatic rifle was designed in response to semi-automatic Soviet rifles, and features many innovations in its design. Battlefield V‘s Gewehr 43 is accurate and reliable: every shot lands where players intend to land them, making the medic highly viable at long range engagements. After getting a feel for the Gewehr 43, I immediately found it a dependable rifle – I was hitting targets at a distance that I would have had no hope in nailing in Battlefield 1, and I suddenly find myself wishing the self-loading rifles of Battlefield 1 had this level of consistency.

  • Grand Operations are the centrepiece of Battlefield V, featuring multi-day skirmishes that depict campaigns of World War II. The mission available in the closed alpha is a part of the Narvik campaign, dealing with the British invasion. The first stage is set late in the evening and has the attacking British force work towards knocking out German artillery emplacements. The Germans must defend their artillery and eliminate as many attackers as possible. All of this is set under the Norwegian night sky, aglow with the aurora borealis – the sophistication of the Frostbite engine now is such that aurora can be viewed and enjoyed in a virtual space without the need of powerful solar activity and a ticket on board the AGB-5003, better known as the Shirase.

  • Battlefield V follows in Battlefield 1‘s use of the Frostbite 3.0 Engine, which has evolved to feature more realistic destruction and sophisticated physics-based rendering, giving players more immersion than previously possible. While Battlefield V has improved effects, its requirements are not substantially steeper than those of Battlefield 1: it feels like an incremental upgrade from a visual perspective, rather similar to how iOS 12 is an upgrade that brings subtle new features and performance updates to iOS 11 rather than sweeping changes. By comparison, when Battlefield 1 was announced, it was leaps and bounds further ahead visually than Battlefield 4, even though both games use Frostbite 3.0.

  • Battlefield V introduces an all-new mechanic in which downed players will slowly bleed out unless a medic revives them. This is actually a pretty clever mechanic that prevents players from skipping revives, which is a feature that I did not enjoy from Battlefield 1. By default, players will spawn back in if they bleed out fully, but they can stem blood loss and call for nearby medics to revive them. A new feature is that squad mates can now revive downed allies, as well, even if they are not playing as a medic. This allows one to save squad mates quickly even if a medic is not immediately available, and is balanced out by reducing the amount of health one gets back if revived in this manner. To slow down the revive trains of Battlefield 1, the revive animation in Battlefield V is longer and more detailed. While less efficient, revives feel much more visceral, and an obscene amount of points can be scored for reviving teammates as a medic.

  • While seemingly a side-task, fortification in Battlefield V has proven to be quite handy. I make extensive use of fortifications to create cover where their was previously none, allowing me to set up a reasonably well-defended sniper position in a pinch, and during one match, I noticed enemy players cleverly dropping behind cover and fortifying their position when I began firing upon them with the Karabiner 98k. No longer able to pick them off, I was forced to move on, altering the dynamic of play considerably.

  • Having the Stg 44 as an assault player means being able to run the Waltrud Krupinski loadout. I feel bad for playing the assault on some occasions: emphasising offensive play over support, one cannot heal or resupply teammates in this role. The assault class is intended to provide firepower at close quarters for clearing out capture points aggressively, and this firepower extends to anti-vehicle options. In the closed alpha, only the Panzerfaust is available, but with its high damage, a group of players can very quickly eliminate even the heavy tanks on short order.

  • The single most glaring issue with the Battlefield V alpha is performance: my machine is getting up there in the years, but it’s no slouch, and I’ve heard that individuals with much more powerful setups are still suffering from framerate drops. I’m not sure if others have encountered this issue, but the biggest problem for me was a memory leak that intermittently causes the game to crash. Battlefield 1 was very well optimised, and Battlefield V needs work to ensure that it is able to properly deallocate resources to better improve performance.

  • Here, I make use of the scout class and its Karabiner 98k to land my first kill with a bolt-action rifle. With the sweet spot gone, sniping in Battlefield V is a return to the days of old, where skill and judgement for landing headshots was the only way to be effective with this class. It took some time for me to become familiar with the bullet drop on the Karabiner 98k, but once I got the hang of it, landing headshots with this weapon was incredibly satisfying, knowing that every headshot was from slowly learning the ropes around the weapon.

  • Overall, the UI workflow needs a bit of an improvement: switching from squad spawning to the classic spawning system is very slow, and it is frustrating not to be able to change out my class from this screen. While many of the weapons or customisations are not available right now, I feel that Battlefield V also should make customising archetypes and weapons much more intuitive than it was in Battlefield 1, where the simplified menu made navigation cumbersome. In addition, it is bizarre that even after two years, Battlefield 1 does not allow players to customise their vehicle setups from the menu.

  • Running around with Perrine’s Bren was a riot: of all of the classes: while I was the least comfortable with the support class’ LMGs in Battlefield I, the Bren is very entertaining to use despite its obstructive design and slow fire rate: it’s perfect for the aggressive recon, and playing tactically, defending capture points, is the support class’ forte. The MG34’s slow deployment time and reliance on a bipod made it less suited for playing the support class in the frontlines: players who prefer a much more stationary approach will find this weapon more suitable for them.

  • I’ve spent around seven hours in the closed alpha in total. Yesterday was Canada Day, and although I was tempted to spend the whole of the day playing the Battlefield V alpha, it seemed more fitting to celebrate the nation’s 151th birthday by capitalising on complementary National Parks admissions. I thus strolled around Lake Minnewanka and the abandoned coal mining town of Bankhead by the cool morning air, retreated to the Silver Dragon Chinese restaurant for lunch (their house noodles, crunchy noodles topped with shrimps, chicken, calamari, scallops and vegetables, are delicious) when a sudden downpour rolled on the area, and then browsed the Banff Park Museum National Historic Site, where I looked at various preserved wildlife specimens dating back a hundred years.

  • The weather remained a moody overcast during the afternoon when I set out to walk the Vermillion Lakes trail, but upon reaching the Third Vermillion Lake, the skies began clearing up, and when I reached the First Vermillion Lake again, the weather had largely cleared out. Previous Canada Days were characterised by very warm weather, but this year, things were a bit chillier than usual, making the walk a very refreshing one. Others evidently were enjoying things, too: there were canoes gliding lazily about on the lake’s surface. I was utterly exhausted by the time we returned back to town and sat down to dinner at the Old Spaghetti Factory at Cascade Mall; I ordered their steak and fries with a prawn skewer. Steaks taste fantastic after a good walk, and by the time dinner wrapped up, the rain had returned.

  • The time to kill (TTK) in Battlefield V is much faster than it is in Battlefield 1: it is similar to that of older Battlefield titles, and while it can be frustrating to be at the receiving end, the shorter time also makes combat more visceral. A short TTK encourages tactical play, forcing players to move cover to cover and be very mindful of their surroundings. The system is balanced with the attrition system, which prevents players from camping in one spot.

  • Submachine guns appear to retain their hipfire bonuses: here, I’m running with the Erma EMP. Firing 9mm Parabellum rounds at 550 RPM, the EMP is a fun weapon to use for extreme close quarters. By World War II, submachine guns became much more widespread, and a World War II game thus has much more liberty for weapon selections. A longstanding complaint, however, is the presence of reflector sights on rifles. These complaints indicate a lack of research: the EMP here is equipped with a Nydar 47 sight, which was introduced in 1945 for shotguns. While its mounting on a submachine gun might be unrealistic, Battlefield (save Battlefield 1) has long accommodated for weapon customisations that are not used in real life (such as my propensity of mounting a Chinese JH-406 Coyote sight to American rifles).

  • One of the most noticeable improvements in Battlefield V is that frequent grenade use is largely absent. I’ve died to fragmentation grenades maybe five times at most, and it’s amazing to finally run around without the ever-present risk of dying to lucky grenades as one would in Battlefield 1. From the sounds of things, grenades are still “smart”, with their fuses only counting down once they hit the ground, and I’ve not been too fond of this, since it allows players to throw grenades great distances to score easy kills, as opposed to using them to flush out enemies.

  • Having a Karabiner 98k means that I can finally run the Sora no Woto loadout in the Frostbite Engine: the primary weapon for the Helvetian forces in the anime, Battlefield V‘s Karabiner 98k is the only bolt-action rifle available in the closed alpha, and despite attrition mechanics limiting me only to two additional reloads, I managed to make extensive use of the weapon to pick off distant foes. The scout class of Battlefield V involves a much higher skill level than its Battlefield 1 incarnation as far as headshots go, but having tried the gadgets out, I think that the spotting flare is the only useful gadget: if I had time to pull out my binoculars and spot an enemy by clicking, then I probably had time to shoot them myself.

  • K-bullets were in service during World War I, and were still manufactured during World War II, although with their limited armour penetration (12-13 mm at 100 meters), it’s difficult to see them being reintroduced to Battlefield V, where we have the likes of Churchill and Tiger I tanks that are nigh-impervious to most infantry weapons. I’m not sure what kind of gadgets the scout class will get, but having tools to help with spawning and spotting are likely to be the case. It would also be nice to give the scout class limited anti-vehicle capabilities: earlier Battlefield games allowed scouts to carry C4. The archetypes system may give each subclass specialised roles to fit a specific objective or playstyle, so I’m curious to see how these will turn out.

  • Even now, I’m still amazed that I was fortunate enough to get into the Battlefield V closed alpha: with my luck still running strong, perhaps I should try my hand at getting into Kantai Collection through its notoriously challenging lottery system. I had preloaded the client as soon as I was notified, and on the day that the closed alpha became available, I had enjoyed a Swiss-mushroom burger and beer-battered fries while watching the England and Belgium World Cup game. Belgium scored the lone goal and won that game: when I played my first match of Battlefield V that evening, I joined a team that had fallen behind in tickets, but thanks to the re-implemented ticket bleed system, I ended up helping contribute to my team’s win.

  • The sidearms in Battlefield V fulfill the same roles that their predecessors did in earlier Battlefield titles, being useful for when one runs out of ammunition mid-firefight. In the closed alpha, each class uses the same sidearm, although because it’s very early, I imagine that like Battlefield 1, there will be different sidearms for different archetypes, and that there will be a set of sidearms that all classes can equip.

  • I’m actually not too big on the reinforcements mechanic, which is reminiscent of the killstreaks in Call of Duty, although Battlefield V‘s implementation is more driven by squad performance rather than individual kills, and appears to be an evolution of the Behemoths of Battlefield 1. So far, there have only been two reinforcements: the Sturmtiger and the V-1. The Sturmtiger was intended as an infantry support vehicle and was outfitted with a 380 mm RW 61 rocket launcher that allowed it to punch through enemy fortifications, while the V-1 was one of the first cruise missiles and can deal massive damage. I managed to try both out, and the V-1 is so powerful, it’s almost unfair.

  • Here, I finally try my hand with the armoured vehicles of Battlefield V: at long last, in a modern iteration of the Frostbite Engine, I get to seat myself behind the wheel of some of history’s most famous tanks, including the Tiger I. Long regarded as one of the most iconic of the German tanks, the Tiger I was characterised by its powerful 88 mm gun and heavy armour, allowing it to devastate Allied armour. The Tiger I is also Maho Nishizumi’s tank of choice in Girls und Panzer, being suited for her execution of the Nishizumi style.

  • Visually and aurally, tanks in Battlefield V feel powerful, although in the closed alpha, they proved to be quite fragile and could be blown apart by a few Panzerfaust rounds. As well, tanks are quite sensitive to bumps in the ground, and I recall an amusing moment where I flipped one of my tanks over, allowing the enemy team to shred it. However, when the tanks do connect, they can be a useful presence on the battlefield: here, I shell a distant British tank with the German light tank and annihilate it.

  • Battlefield V is Girls und Panzer in the Frostbite Engine, or as Gandalf might say, Girls of Panzer: Dream Tank Match as it should have been: learning a tank’s strengths and weaknesses is essential to victory, as each tank has different handling characteristics and a specific role to play. Unlike the luck-driven mechanics of Dream Tank MatchBattlefield V‘s tank combat looks to be skill-oriented. I’m hoping that there will be a dedicated armoured warfare-only mode that pits tanks against tanks only: it’s high time that DICE showed the world the might of the Frostbite Engine and proper skill against the likes of World of Tanks.

  • I would’ve gotten this post earlier, but today, I attended a LAN party and played Halo 2 old school on Xbox, with split-screen and the like. Besides catching up with friends, I also somehow managed to perform much better than usual: I’m terrible with console games, but today, managed a few double kills and even a killing spree, keeping my KD ratio above one and helping my team win several matches: during my final game, I scored the winning flag capture. Halo 2 is the game that really got me into shooters, and since the Halo 2 PC servers were decommissioned, I’ve been looking for a similar type of shooter. Battlefield has since filled that particular role. This was time spent away from playing the Battlefield V closed alpha, but in the end, I feel like I’ve gotten a pretty good handle on what my thoughts are for this current build.

  • The Panzer IV, Miporin’s tank of choice, also figured in the closed alpha as a medium tank. There’s an interesting bug where the KwK 40 L/43 anti-tank gun will shorten, making the tank resemble the Ausf. F1 variant, but zooming in and back out rectifies this. This visual bug will hopefully be fixed in newer builds of Battlefield V, and one other visual element I’d like to see fixed is the fact that some UI elements can be very difficult to see, especially amidst the white snows of Norway. Adding a translucent, glassy box to put the text on, as with Battlefield 1, would be one possible fix.

  • Here, I use the Sturmtiger to melt an enemy, and this brings my current set of thoughts on the Battlefield V closed alpha to an end. I’m very glad to have had the opportunity to give it a spin, and while it’s still rough around the edges, the core concepts of attrition, teamwork and fortification add new depth to the game, bringing back skill and encouraging tactical play. Performance issues, movement and the UI are my biggest gripes about this build, but my initial impressions are especially positive – by the time this closed alpha came to an end, I was nailing back-to-back headshots with the Karabiner 98k and having a ball of a time in helping my team out. I do have another post coming out in the future dealing with what I’d like to see in Battlefield V from a content perspective, as well as things that shouldn’t be in the Battlefield series, period. For now, with this set of initial impressions of the closed alpha in the books, I return to my usual scheduled posts: Sword Art Online Alternative: Gun Gale Online‘s finale and the Violet Evergarden OVA are on the schedule, as is Harukana Receive‘s first episode.

On the whole, my impressions of Battlefield V is that this is a game that will put skill back into Battlefield. Random chance and luck won’t figure as much as knowing the map, one’s weapons and role in a squad, so players who take the time to play the game will be rewarded with superior performance. While the new mechanics are fabulous, there are some others that will take some getting used to or be tweaked slightly. Attrition really slows down gameplay, but it also limits players a little too much in its current state. Giving players 20-30 percent more ammunition capacity would give players more freedom once they’ve resupplied. I imagine that spotting will not likely go through many major changes, and so, despite me not liking it, I can see myself eventually learning the mechanics as time wears on, much as how I got used to the differences between Battlefield 4 and Battlefield 3‘s spotting. Beyond this, it’s a promising start for Battlefield V: once the technical issues are resolved, and the game is optimised, if the movement system is also improved to be a little smoother and intuitive, the new mechanics could very well usher in a new way to play Battlefield that takes the best of older titles while encouraging more tactical, methodical gameplay. This approach is, curiously enough, completely contrary to how I play shooters, but in offering something new, Battlefield V has persuaded me to change my approach and in the process, I gained a much richer experience for it. If my experiences in the open beta prove to be as positive, then the decision to purchase Battlefield V would be an easy one to make.