The Infinite Zenith

Where insights on anime, games, academia and life dare to converge

Tag Archives: Battlefield V

Battlefield V: Tides of War Overture, Panzerstorm, Killtrocity and a Headshot Record

“I guess the operation can be, let’s see, Operation Sneaky Sneaks, because I want to sneakily see what the enemy is up to, then sneakily attack them.” —Miho “Miporin” Nishizumi, Girls und panzer

Overture was the first instalment to Battlefield V‘s Tides of War programme, and introduced a new map, Panzerstorm. During the past month, DICE also experienced the impact of a particularly controversial decision to increased the TTK, reasoning that new players were being discouraged by frequent quick deaths and not returning to the game. With the community feedback overwhelmingly requesting that TTK be restored, DICE graciously complied: the issue in Battlefield V lay not in the TTK, but TTD (the perceived time it takes to die). Faulty netcode gives the impression that players are dying in fewer frames than is actually the case, and at the time of writing, remains an issue; when TTK was increased, the game became disjointed. It was taking more time to take out an enemy player, further compounding the sense that an enemy should not have been able to down one so quickly. When DICE reverted this, Battlefield V immediately became considerably more fun. However, Tides of War, the continuous service programme, has also exposed limitations in Battlefield V; the assignments were not functioning and so, players could not unlock the new weapons on numerous occasions. I played through upwards of six hours of Grand Operations to get the first step of the final week in Overture to work, and others have reported being unable to unlock the new weapons, which are limited-time. The prizes for finishing each interval adds aesthetically unique, but otherwise unremarkable weapons to the game, as well as leave the medics yearning for more weapons. Between this, and bugs in the sound system allowing players to sneak around, Battlefield V looks off to a rough start; DICE does appear to have forgotten about their past successes and what made previous Battlefield titles fun. However, looking beyond Battlefield V‘s frustrations also finds a plethora of things to enjoy. Things work more often than they do not, and when one lines up a finely-aimed headshot or pulls off a successful flank, there is a sense of reward quite unlike that of any earlier Battlefield titles: Battlefield V is much harder than its predecessors.

After making my way through Overture, and steadily becoming more familiar with Battlefield V, the quality of my experience has improved since starting out. Knowing where player paths are means I can anticipate how others move around the map, and correspondingly adjust my path to surprise them, or else flush out campers from spots that are popular among those who would otherwise sit still and rack up kills without contributing to their team. Increased vehicle play has allowed me to fully upgrade my Panzer IV and Tiger I, and the return of the Ribeyrolles 1918 has provided the Assault Class with an unparalleled automatic rifle that is lethal at medium ranges, but can hold its own in closer quarters even despite its lower rate of fire. While I’ve not agreed with all of the Tides of War assignments (least of all those that forced me to play Grand Operations), the assignments that were the most enjoyable were those that encouraged team play. Reviving, healing, resupplying and repairing friendly players and assets lead to a much more cohesive experience, and it is great to be revived by players standing beside me. The vehicle assignments were also enjoyable: while vehicles remain death traps owing to how potent the Panzerfaust is, having incentive to use the vehicles and rank them up meant that my German tanks are now specialised. The promise of cosmetics and assignments provide plenty of reason to play; assignments tend to put my focus on doing something specific, and this has enticed me to return to Battlefield V in spite of all of its frustrations and bugs. It is clear that DICE hasn’t struck out on Battlefield V — weekly and daily assignments made Battlefield 1 significantly more fun, and seeing these carry over to Battlefield V show that lessons from Battlefield 1 stuck. The journey to unlocking everything and reaching level 20 in Tides of War was generally a fun one, and now that I’ve spent more time in Battlefield V, it becomes apparent that Battlefield V is much more of a skill game than Battlefield 1 was.

Screenshots and Commentary

  • My initial goal was to get the Panzer IV upgraded as far as I could: in its default Ausf. D configuration, the tank is largely suited for anti-infantry engagements, as well as taking out soft targets like transports. However, the Ausf. D configuration is quite vulnerable to Panzerfausts, and is ill-suited for taking on other tanks, so my main use for it was to provide fire support onto capture points.

  • The Sturmtiger is a unique reinforcement vehicle that is intended for hammering enemy positions, and here, I use it to get a double kill in an attempt to single-handedly clear out a position on my own. Panzerstorm is an interesting map, featuring plenty of open fields that is evidently suited for vehicle warfare, so infantry players won’t have such a good time on this map. While it was advertised as being for large scale armoured combat, Panzerstorm did not deliver: each team has upwards of seven tanks, leaving 25 players to go on foot. In order to create proper armoured warfare, I feel that doubling the tank count per team would make things a lot more exciting.

  • The ultimate reinforcement remains the missile strikes: here, I scored my first-ever Killfrenzy (a multi-kill of six) on Arras using the JB-2 rocket. This match, I was doing particularly poorly on, but as time wore on, both the team and I managed to mount a comeback. While focusing on capturing points, I got lucky with kills made while defending points and eventually managed to earn enough points for the rocket strike. Seeing a number of enemies amassed at the town centre, I called in the JB-2 and the rest is history: I went KD positive, and the team won.

  • Bombers are nowhere nearly as overpowered as the Ilya Muromets now, but a skilled player can still do serious damage with one. Perhaps a carry-over from my Battlefield 1 days, the bombers are my favourite planes to fly in Battlefield V: I have no trouble getting them to go where I wish them to go, and hitting targets on the ground is straightforwards with bombs. Bombs deal massive damage to whatever they hit, enough to annihilate vehicles, but are more precise than the cluster shells, so the days of being able to empty out entire capture points with one bombing run are thankfully over.

  • We’re very nearly a week into 2019 now: the year opened with a ham dinner with mayonnaise à la Futurama‘s Judge Whitey. We used a special Dijon-honey-mayonnaise sauce that was heaven on earth, and then earlier this weekend, I made a homemade dip for yam fries that was very tasty despite lacking Chipotle that gives the dip a distinctly smokey flavour. The festivities of Christmas are past, and we enter the long dark of winter now.

  • In a particularly memorable match on Rotterdam, I went on a kill-streak with the Valentine MK VIII medium tank. After being blown apart by Panzerfausts, I spawned back in as a sniper, single-handedly defended the train station point until my squad arrived, and then sent off a JB-2 Rocket that scored a Killfrenzy. Battlefield games where things go well usually have things go really well, and thanks to the revised Conquest system, comebacks are now possible. I’ve won some games where I was certain we would lose.

  • Ever since I unlocked the MP-40 for the medic, I’ve found a versatile weapon that handles well enough for the ranges that I play at. This submachine gun is especially useful on Devastation: having spent more time here, I’ve found that my performance has seen an improvement now that I know where all of the routes are, and the close-quarters makes the medics much more useful. The capture point in the cathedral is the most hotly contested spot on the map, so a combination of smoke grenades and revivals allow one to very quickly bring their teammates back to life.

  • While advertised as a major piece of Battlefield V, I’ve actually yet to see more players tow stationary weapons to new positions to defend capture points. Here, I use the Pak 40 to hammer distant foes. When the assignment to destroy a tank came up, I considered using this as a means of scoring kills against tanks, since for my part, I use tanks in an anti-infantry role, but stationary weapons leave players very exposed to sniper fire. One of the assignments involved using stationary guns to score two kills, and I found that this was best done on Narvik, where one can build Vickers guns flanked by sandbags.

  • Specialising the Panzer IV with additional armour and the Kwk 40 turns it into the Ausf. H version that Miho commands in Girls und Panzer. Despite the upgrades in firepower and defense, I still would not use the Panzer IV in a direct contest against other tanks, instead, using the Panzer IV’s superior mobility to flank around and hit enemy armour from the sides or rear, as well as to suppress and control infantry.

  • The Lewis Gun saw a major upgrade in Battlefield V: it is now remarkably effective as a run-and-gun weapon, but also has enough firepower to be moderately useful as a defensive weapon. When properly specialised, its recoil is reduced greatly, extending its range, and with a higher rate of fire, the gun is very competitive. I never did get into using the Lewis Gun of Battlefield 1, as its low rate of fire greatly restricted its use.

  • After upgrading the Panzer IV fully, I turned my attention to the Tiger I. This tank is Maho’s choice from Girls und Panzer, and is the choicest tank for anti-armour combat. Inherently more durable and capable than the Panzer IV, the Tiger I is much slower to operate, making it ill-suited for anti-infantry combat at closer ranges. Fully specialised, the Tiger I becomes even more effective in an anti-vehicle role at long ranges: Battlefield V is more punishing than World of Tanks, and anyone who attempts to pull the Nishizumi-ryu here by blindly charging onto a capture point will have their faces melted by Panzerfausts before one could say panzer vor.

  • One significant downgrade from earlier Battlefield titles is that custom emblems have not been implemented as of yet, and so, I cannot authentically run with Girls und Panzer themed emblems on my tanks. I’m not sure what the rationale for cutting them from Battlefield V is: granted, I’ve seen some questionable emblems before, but for the most part, people run with harmless emblems, so it makes no sense to restrict people from using them.

  • I got another Killtrocity on Arras using the V-1 rocket during the week where squad assignments were active. This proved to be sufficient for both unlocking the “called in a reinforcement” and “as a squad, kill 2 enemies with rocket strikes” assignments. I’ve heard of people who were unlucky in that they called in the rocket and hit one person with it, but did not get credit for it; whether it was a stroke of luck or from the Killtrocity, I ended up clearing the assignment. This allowed me to unlock an epic mask, although I prefer running stock soldiers and weapons with standard skins. For my part, I’m saving all of my company coin for specialising weapons and vehicles.

  • The Gewehr M95/30 is the next bolt-action rifle for the scout class. With a smaller capacity and more damage than the Lee-Enfield No. 4 Mk I, it is the hardest hitting of the bolt-action rifles. However, to balance it out, it lacks the straight-pull bolt of its Battlefield 1 incarnation. Sniping in Battlefield V has been much more challenging (and rewarding for it) than Battlefield 1, but curiously enough, my scout class is the same rank as my medic class at the time of writing.

  • Here, I run the Churchill Mk VII, a British heavy tank that Darjeeling fields. Compared to the Tiger I, it is slower and hits harder, but has lower muzzle velocity. I’ve had some successes with the Churchill Mk VII and the Valentine Mk VIII, but found the Churchill Gun Carrier to be completely ineffectual: without a turret, the tank is easily flanked by infantry. So far, Battlefield V has been very limited with its selection of vehicles, and I’m hoping that Tides of War will rectify this: there’s so much stuff in World War Two that could be introduced into the game.

  • The Turner SMLE is conversion of the SMLE Mk. III that I was so fond of from Battlefield 1 that gives it semi-automatic fire. Not quite as hard-hitting as the Gewehr 43, the Turner SMLE fires slightly faster and therefore, is more useful at closer ranges. Having spent many frustrating matches on Panzerstorm, and then several okay matches, and some good ones, I can say that the map does require more vehicles to allow for players to really make use of its size. From an aesthetic perspective, Panzerstorm looks amazing and brings to mind the landscapes of Interior BC.

  • The StG 44 has been degraded from its beta and alpha performance: lacking the stability for long distance shooting compared to the Turner SMLE and M1A1 Carbine, but also sporting a lower full-automatic fire rate that result in its being outclassed by the Gewehr 1-5 and M1907, the StG 44 occupies an unusual middle ground where it excels at neither. The key to using this gun well is at those short-to-medium ranges and tap-fire the weapon, aiming for the head where possible, but on the whole, the StG 44 is simply eclipsed by other weapons.

  • By comparison, the Ribeyrolles is now the ultimate assault weapon bar none: its low rate of fire and high accuracy allows it to fulfil the role between that of the assault rifles and semi-automatic rifles. Being able to put more damage downrange than the semi-automatic rifles, while having a longer reach than the assault rifles, the Ribeyrolles is reliable, versatile and leaves me confident knowing that I am equipped to deal with enemies at most ranges the assault class is designed for.

  • The return of skill-based sniping in Battlefield V means that long-range headshots are much harder to score than in Battlefield 1; with the Gewehr 98 in Battlefield 1 and its high muzzle velocity, I scored a 383 metre headshot on Sinai desert towards the end of my time in the game. In Battlefield V, muzzle velocities are closer to their Battlefield 4 values, and so, bullet drop is more pronounced than before. Coupled with reduced cenre mass damage, all of the scratches and smudging on the long-range optics, and harder to see enemies, sniping is a challenge, so landing those shots becomes even more rewarding. Here, I scored a headshot of 257 meters on Hamada – it’s my personal best in Battlefield V so far.

  • The Ribeyrolles is so accurate that if two opponents are lined up, one can get consecutive headshots, back-to-back. Battlefield V‘s incarnations of weapons seen in Battlefield 1 have been varied: of the ones I’ve unlocked, the Lewis gun, M1907 and Ribeyrolles absolutely outclass their Battlefield 1 iterations, while the shotguns have felt more ineffective in general.

  • I had all but given up on trying to destroy a tank, but during a match of conquest on Twisted Steel, I hopped into a Tiger I with the intent of ranking it up, and managed to blast an enemy Churchill to finish the Mechanised Brawl assignment done. Because of their vulnerability, tanks of Battlefield V take an additional level of skill and patience to use: one cannot simply brawl with the Tiger I, as the tank is best suited for ranged engagements against enemy vehicles. I have reached rank for with the tank now, and intend to spec it out fully for anti-tank engagements.

  • The Selbstlader 1906 was a weapon I never touched in Battlefield 1 – as a medic self-loading rifle with only five rounds available, the weapon was very difficult to use and was quite unsuited for closer ranges that medics played at. By comparison, Battlefield V places it with the scout class, and while unremarkable from a statistics perspective, its performance in practise is reasonable.

  • The M30 Drilling is a double-barrelled shotgun, similar to the Model 1900 of Battlefield 1 (which I loved), but has one additional twist: there’s a third barrel that fires a rifle cartridge, allowing the weapon to be used in situations where buckshot is insufficient to deal with. This rifle round allows the M30 to handle like the Martini-Henry, and because it only has one shot, it is the ultimate skill weapon. I’ve used the cartridge to surprise enemies, and the buckshot is remarkably effective in the ruins of Devastation as well.

  • My experience with the Tides of War was smooth for the most part – leaving a server and then finding a new one was often enough to force an assignment to track. The exception was the Grand Operations assignments, which refused to track regardless of how many times I restarted Battlefield V. After three days, it finally began tracking, and it was a short journey towards finishing enough of the branches to unlock the prize; the A/g m42 is a semi-automatic rifle for the assault class that handles most similarly to the M1A1 Carbine, albeit with slightly more damage but a limited magazine.

  • Here, I score a triple kill while flying over the village of Arras: having spent a nontrivial amount of time in Battlefield V and having reached rank 40, I’m burning through the progression system, and it feels that Battlefield V was deliberate in having a shorter progression system, allowing players to unlock everything quickly so that they could focus on Tides of War activities once those became available. While I feel that Battlefield V‘s progression system is shorter, it is still more advanced than that of Battlefield 1‘s, and  looks extensible enough so that adding more levels and rewards should be a straightforward endeavour.

  • Cheating in Battlefield has always been a point of contention: contrary to perjurers who would have players believe cheaters are non-existent, the reality is that they exist, and in a game like Battlefield V, where there is reduced spotting and game mechanics control scoring, it becomes very apparent to spot cheaters. Here, I blasted a fellow by the name of “ironmaiden0911”, who was topping the scoreboard with over 100 kills and 2 deaths within the first three minutes of Airborne. Frustration was very much a reality: at the time, I was trying to finish a grand operation and could not simply leave. In the end, my team lost, but I did managed to kill them at least once. A glance at their stats show they’ve been banned now, having not opened the game since I played them last.

  • At the opposite end of the spectrum are the simply spectacular, emergent moments that arise in Battlefield: here on a match of Grand Operations, another bomber got into my tail and began damaging me, but I somehow managed to bank, flew over them, and in a moment of inspiration, I unloaded my bombs on them. They connected and destroyed his vehicle; I thus bombed a bomber.

  • Besides more vehicles and content, one thing I would love to see in Battlefield V would be swappable reinforcements that one could pick and choose from. At different levels, reinforcements become unlocked, and then one could choose which ones to equip. For instance, I never call in the supply drop or vehicle-killers, so having different reinforcements would be amazing. While Call of Duty: WW2 is inferior to Battlefield V in just about every department, the number of options for killstreaks was well done. Battlefield V could take things one step further, doing things that can’t be done in Call of Duty  by adding new reinforcements that one could pick from. Some of my ideas include picking up a proper flamethrower, calling in an aircraft that spots all enemies in an area for 10 seconds, artillery strikes on two locations of one’s choosing (weaker than the rocket attacks, but allows one to hit one more location), and a player-controlled strategic bomber like the B-17 or B-29 that acts as an aerial equivalent of the Sturmtiger or Churchill Crocodile.

  • Another thing I would like to see is more class archetypes: the default ones are satisfactory and render the unlockable ones quite unnecessary, but I would like to see archetypes for increased movement speed, more stealth, ability to carry more ammo or more efficient spotting. Again, there’s so much that can be done that I would not be surprised if Tides of War added new archetypes later. Here, I get a double kill with the MG 34; the bug with bipod deployment aside, the medium machine guns are actually fun to use. In particular, when one is using the MG 34 with the bipod, it becomes a death machine that performs exceedingly well in a defensive role. I’ve come to enjoy the MG 34, and have specialised it to have increased accuracy and firing rate, as well as the double-drum magazine, which also allows for a faster reload. When the situation demands a run-and-gun style, I will return to the KE-7 and Lewis gun.

  • The next Tides of War chapter opens in a few days, being pushed back: I hope that this means DICE is pushing out patches to address issues previously encountered. Beyond this, I am looking forwards to seeing what is available in the next Tides of War, and ideally, we’d also gain an idea as to whether or not iconic content is being added in the future. Battlefield V remains shaped by what it could potentially become, and if the base game is mechanically solid, then the sky is the limit as to what DICE could potentially do with Battlefield V; I would be okay with DICE deciding to support Battlefield V for an extended period beyond two years, improving the game and building a long-term community to make a smooth, polished and content-rich game akin to how Rainbow Six Siege and Counter Strike: Global Offensive have done things.

While Battlefield V still has its share of bugs, being much more rocky and unpredictable than Battlefield 1, there are new patches coming out this month that will hopefully address some of the frustrations players have seen. Developers have been working on a fix for vaulting and bipod deployment, for instance, and I’m hoping that TTD is addressed so that I am sustaining damage at the same rate that I can deal damage. If anything, the TTK experiment showed that simply changing weapon damage won’t be a solution; the short TTK increases the value of tactical, smart play, and improving TTD would similarly allow players to anticipate how much time they have to get out of a bad situation. Beyond this, I’ve become somewhat acclimatised to the minimal spotting system, and while I still prefer the approaches Battlefield 3 and 4 took, I feel that should DICE properly address the sound of gunfire and footsteps, Battlefield V could keep its current spotting system and remain enjoyable. I admit that it took a bit of time to actually complete the Overture chapter of Tides of War, but the journey was a largely entertaining one. Battlefield V has shown plenty of promise, and given DICE’s track record, I am optimistic that the game will become more polished and correspondingly, more fun to play as time wears on. As far as content goes, the game is still very much missing American and Russian soldiers, maps and weapons; the iconic M4 Sherman and M1 Garand, or the Russian PPSh-41 and T-34 tanks, absolutely must be rendered in the Frostbite Engine, along with Stalingrad and Normandy. Contrary to any perception that these are stale, I would very much like to see World War Two’s most iconic battles in what is one of the most sophisticated game engines available. I think that the next chapter in Tides of War take us to the coasts of Greece, but if we are to get monthly content, I would hope that the more recognisable aspects of World War Two are added to Battlefield V: from a technical perspective, Battlefield V far outclasses Call of Duty: WWII, and I would love to see the DICE take on things that Call of Duty: WWII did not adequately capture.

Battlefield V: Twelve Hours of Multiplayer and First Impressions

“Real luxury is customisation.” –Lapo Elkann

DICE’s latest addition to the Battlefield franchise brings with it many new changes; despite a rocky marketting campaign and launch, Battlefield V handles much more smoothly than its predecessor, bringing with it a host of modifications that were intended to emphasise skill and team play even more so than previous Battlefield games, alongside major visual improvements. Now that Battlefield V is launched, and following my purchase of the title, I have a more solid understanding for what works and what requires reconsideration in Battlefield V. Like Battlefield 1, which took me some time to get used to, Battlefield V offers enough of a change to mechanics so that getting used to weapon handling, map layouts and other nuances so that it will take a bit of commitment to get used to the way things work here. The current state of Battlefield V is such that this is both a positive and a negative; on one hand, with eight maps at launch and a comparatively small selection of weapons, jumping in and getting familiar with everything won’t be a challenge, but on the other hand, this does not leave for much variety once one begins unlocking everything. The limited content is a consequence of the Tides of War system that replaces the Battlefield Premium system, providing continuous support and updates for the game during its lifespan, free of charge, to all players. Over time, Battlefield V will have more maps, more weapons and more options for players, along with bug fixes, that will almost certainly see the game improve, and given how DICE continuously improved previous Battlefield titles, it is no surprise that Battlefield V will see the same treatment. Some mechanics are fairly quick to acclimatise with, such as the attrition system, which has been balanced now to encourage team members to help one another out, without restricting players to one firefight, or weapon characteristics, which are much more consistent. Others are indicative of poor design choices: my biggest gripe about Battlefield V is enemy visibility, which has encouraged the practise of camping. Being killed by enemies concealed in foliage or masquerading as a downed player is immeasurably frustrating, detracting from the skill aspect (anyone can stay in one spot and rack up kills at the expense of helping their team out), although as with Battlefield 1, I expect that with time, acclimatisation and possible updates could mitigate this.

Battlefield V has its frustrating moments because enemies are near-impossible to see, but when things connect, there are also plenty of Only in Battlefield™ moments, as well. Successfully completing a flank and blasting unaware opponents, spawning onto a beacon on a contested capture point to surprise enemies or landing headshots from a distance are immensely satisfying, offering a hint of what can be accomplished with improving skill and knowledge. The weapons feel heftier than they did in Battlefield 1, and watching shots connect is rewarding. More rewarding is when one joins and contributes to a good squad: reviving and being revived by squad-mates is immensely fun, as is constantly throwing around ammunition and receiving ammunition from squad-mates. The scout class also gains access to a spotting scope that can pick out concealed enemies and make them stick out. Sniping is also incredibly satisfying, even more so than in Battlefield 1, since the bolt-action rifles have been made more difficult to wield. For the most part, my best games involve me playing the objectives in a much more defensive approach with teammates, steering clear of open areas and waiting for the team to make a push before advancing. Battlefield V also marks the return of a meaningful progression system, providing incentive to use every class, weapon and vehicle available. Levelling up confers different benefits, including new equipment and weapons, specialisations that impact the weapon’s performance, and access to cosmetics. More unlocks will be provided with the Tides of War updates over time, so the relative lack of content now will be rectified as the game matures. While the mechanics are largely solid, especially surrounding the gunplay and progression, Battlefield V still has quite a ways to go yet before it is as smooth and polished as Battlefield 1 – Battlefield V is still very early in its life and therefore, the game is likely to receive many changes over the course of the next two years.

Screenshots and Commentary

  • After picking up Battlefield V, I skipped over the campaign and immediately dropped into a match of conquest. Fjell 652 was the first map I got, and is said to be Battlefield V‘s Argonne Forest. While an uninspired map, its focus on infantry gameplay and the occasional aircraft gives the map a cleaner feel than Argonne Forest. I scored my first kill with the Sturmgewehr 1-5 (Volkssturmgewehr) here: the base weapons available to each class are useful and effective, and we would go on to win this match.

  • I’ve never been much of a pilot, and so, it is unlikely that I will have the chance to unlock more of the specialisations for aircraft, but in the few moments where I have hopped behind the driver’s seat of an aircraft, I’ve found that planes in Battlefield V handle very well. With beginner’s luck in my corner, I flew behind a bomber and destroyed it for my first double kill of Battlefield V proper. Flying can be fun, although because of my preference for other modes of combat, I’m generally not too effective when in the air.

  • The V-1 Rocket (and its Allied counterpart, the American JB-2) are the most powerful reinforcements available to players in Battlefield V: they are accessed by carrying out squad activities and provide support to a squad. The airstrike option is most reminiscent of the kill-streaks of Call of Duty, but in Battlefield V, must be earned through team play. Reinforcements come in several forms, and for the most part, squad leaders tend to save their points up for airstrikes. A successful airstrike is immensely satisfying, and have the effect of clearing out capture points for a squad to then take.

  • Having played Sinai Desert to death during Battlefield 1‘s beta, I was never particularly fond of the other desert maps in Battlefield 1: Fao Fortress and Suez were dreary, dull-looking maps. By comparison, Battlefield V‘s Hamada is beautiful, offering ruins and foliage, gullies and ravines to fight in. Set during the day, the map is very bright, and its open spaces make longer range weapons useful. It’d be a great map save for using the conquest assault mode: other game types on this map are generally enjoyable. Back in the alpha and beta, the Gewehr 43 was one of my favourite weapons for its precision: it’s since been balanced to have more spread if fired repeatedly, but at range, it remains effective.

  • Because random bullet deviation (alternatively known as “Kantai Collection-style random chance and luck”) is gone from Battlefield V, the assault rifles can be made to reach out quite far and still remain accurate if one tap fires. One of my challenges now is to dispense with the Battlefield 1 mindset of emptying magazines at enemies, and return to making short, controlled bursts to hit enemies from a distance, a technique that was superbly effective in Battlefield 4.

  • From an aesthetic standpoint, Devastation is extremely well done, capturing the feel of a completely ruined urban environment. With burning buildings, charred brick walls and the twisted skeleton of steel structures, Devastation’s layout is similar to that of Tsaritsyn. The dark environments and clutter convey a sense of ruin, but also makes it incredibly difficult to see enemies clearly. On the plus side, there are not unskilled players spamming gas grenades every other moment; excessive use of explosives have been dramatically lessened compared to Battlefield 1.

  • The medic class in Battlefield V has seen some improvement, but a bit of a downgrade from its Battlefield 1 equivalent: medics are now more valuable because they can provide allied players with a single use health kit for restoring their health fully. Players can no longer fully regenerate their health after sustaining damage and must use health kits to do so, forcing them to either find a medical crate or ask friendlies to toss them health kits. This is the medic’s real utility, besides being able to revive allied players quickly. With their medical syringe being equipped separately, medics can also equip different gadgets, but these have been underwhelming so far.

  • In Battlefield 1, the AT Rocket Gun was a well-balanced anti-tank weapon: dealing good damage to armour while forcing players to use their bipods and compensate for a slow projectile speed, it took skill and teamwork to use these in concert to destroy armour. The Panzerfaust, on the other hand, can destroy vehicles with too much ease. Two players can quickly ruin even the Tiger I, and the Panzer IV can be destroyed by a single player: if Girls und Panzer worked the same way as Battlefield V presently, a squad of three players (two assault and one support) could solo the whole of Black Forest.

  • When the opportunity arises, I’ve largely used the Panzer IV in an anti-infantry role: having come to enjoy how machine guns for tanks operated in Battlefield 1 worked, I took a similar approach to Battlefield V and found a moderate degree of success: compared to their performance in the beta, the machine guns no longer spray out tracers and have a slower firing sound, allowing one to lead shots better without wasting excessive ammunition. The main cannons on tanks, on the other hand, are not so effective: I’ve gotten into protracted exchanges with other armoured vehicles where neither of us were able to destroy the other without at least five direct hits.

  • Besides the bolt-action rifles, scouts have access to self-loading rifles now. Once a part of the medic class in Battlefield 1, self-loading rifles hit harder than the semi-automatic rifles of the assault kit and are a solid choice for medium range combat. I typically run with the 3x magnification on these rifles, since I expect to encounter enemies closer up than I would if I were playing with a bolt-action rifle, which are most effective with the high-powered scope.

  • For my first few hours, I was unsuccessful in finding a server running the Arras map. Easily one of the most scenic maps in Battlefield V, it’s got wide open fields of canola and a town at the map’s centre. Soldiers often hide in the canola and camp the capture points, coming from unexpected angles to surprise those trying to push onto a point. The point in the town itself is the most heavily contested, and changes the most hands in a match. Here, I call in a V-1 and watched as it impacted one of the capture points to score a double kill before the match ended: the explosion itself is spectacular.

  • Twisted Steel is another map with solid visuals: the foliage and swampy terrain is superb. Fighting is most intense on the damaged bridge that crosses the map, and thanks to the numerous trees, teams that control the bridge cannot simply snipe players down below. Again, a good medium range weapon on this map is useful, since there are open spaces between the capture point. One aspect of Battlefield V that indicates good design is the fact that weapons all have various optics immediately available for use, allowing one to not be restricted to the iron sights. Battlefield 4 required players get kills with a weapon before the sights could unlock, and since Battlefield has never done an adequate job with making iron sights usable, I tend to avoid them.

  • Being heavy tanks, Battlefield V‘s Tiger I and Churchill Mk VII are incredibly slow to manoeuvre, making them easy targets for Panzerfaust-wielding assault players. While heavy tanks traditionally had heavier armour and more powerful main cannons for anti-armour combat, the damage model present now means that even heavy tanks are not too effective against enemy armour, and their slow turret traversal makes them ill-suited for dealing with infantry. This is why I’ve chose to run the Panzer IV, whose setup makes it much better for supporting allied forces.

  • Aerodrome is set in a large, dark desert area reminiscent of Fao Fortress, but with one critical exception: there’s a large aircraft hangar at the center of the map, and fighting converges here. This is an excellent map for long-distance shooting, and Battlefield V has absolutely nailed the sniping mechanics. With no sweet spot and slower bullet velocities, the skill comes back into sniping as it had for Battlefield 4, so landing headshots becomes even more rewarding than it was previously. At present, my longest headshot is 198 metres.

  • The inside of Aerodrome’s main hangar is superbly designed and looks amazing. The planes in here can be destroyed over the course of the battle, and I love the lighting. However, I typically avoid fighting here, either on foot or in a vehicle, since the chaos makes it very easy to die to stray bullets. However, there are occasions where, with enough infantry support, I’ll push onto the point to help capture it, and a tank can be useful on such a push.

  • One of the most unusual features of Battlefield V isn’t a gameplay mechanic: the text chat will automatically censor out profanity and words deemed offensive, and the biggest problem with this is that it captures non-offensive words, such as “assault”. Ironically, the player characters themselves spout profanity when they are downed. I’m not sure why game developers feel compelled to bend to the will of virtue signallers, or how a few social media posts from virtue signallers can have such an impact on entertainment in general: for now, I’m glad that at the very least, virtue signallers have not negatively impacted the core gameplay of titles like Battlefield V.

  • The AT rocket gun was a fun weapon to use in the event one needed a longer-range weapon for picking off distant foes: because players needed to use a bipod, the weapon demanded situational awareness and map familiarity. By comparison, the Panzerfaust can be fired with reasonable accuracy from the shoulder and takes next to no skill to use: players of all experiences use it to score kills to an excessive degree, and I hope that this weapon’s destructive power is reduced to be more in line with the AT rocket gun, forcing assault players to stick with their squad if they wish to destroy vehicles.

  • The customisation I miss the most from Battlefield 1 is the emblems, which allowed me to run with the Ooarai logo or anime faces. I’ve heard that this feature will return with a later update, which will allow me to really run Girls und Panzer: Dream Tank Match in the Frostbite Engine. There is a certain satisfaction to listening to complaints about them in the text chat, and here, I blast another player with the Panzer IV in the wheat fields of Arras. Thanks to my completing the Road to Battlefield challenge some weeks ago, I have a variety of Arras skins and two special customisation sets.

  • The starting bolt action rifle, the Lee Enfield No. 4 Mk I has a good magazine size and fire rate, but slow bullet velocity and damage. These characteristics make it a solid weapon for beginners who are learning the ropes: the magazine size and fire rate allows for follow-up shots to be made, while the low muzzle velocity really forces one to account for bullet drop. I’ve had success in lining up and landing consecutive kills with this weapon, an all-around excellent teacher for the scout mechanics.

  • The ribbons of Battlefield V are a mystery to me: their appearance may or may not correspond with a scoring bonus, and there’s no display in the menu system to indicate what ribbons there are and the number that one has unlocked. One noticeable bug with ribbons is that they appear when certain criteria are not satisfied yet, and overall, it’s a little strange as to what purpose the ribbons serve. By comparison, medals have a clear unlock pattern and per community request, are always active. The only downside is that they presently can only be unlocked once, so I’m hoping they will be unlockable as many time as one earns their criteria (save the campaign medals).

  • The light tank Axis players access is the Panzer 38(t): while effectual against other light tanks, the 38(t) was inadequate against medium and heavy tanks. Production stopped in 1942, but the chassis would be used as the basis for the Hetzer. Battlefield V‘s light tanks are best suited for anti-infantry roles: having the fastest top speed and quickest turret traversal, they can be used to engage infantry effectively, especially if the right specialisations are selected, but their mobility comes at a cost; their light armour and 37 mm cannon makes them unable to take damage and deal damage to armour.

  • While the various Witches of Strike Witches and Brave Witches tend to run with iron sights, I prefer having a good set of optics on my weapons. Depending on the availability, I run with the Nydar sights, a simple but effective equivalent to the Coyote Sight of Battlefield 4, or the holographic sight. Here, I run the MG 34, a medium machine gun (MMG) that must have its bipod deployed in order for one to aim down sights. The idea of MMGs is a fun one that extends the support class’ usefulness, allowing one to hunker down and lay down serious suppressive fire to help a team hold a position.

  • Replicating the Hanna-Justina Wallia Rosalind Sieglinde Marseille loadout with the corresponding play-style (aggressive rushes) won’t be possible in Battlefield V, since the MMGs have terrible hip-fire accuracy. WIthout Hanna’s magic, players simply won’t be able to adopt a run-and-gun the same way Witches do: the MG 42 similarly cannot be used this way, so one will not be able to play the same way Gertrude and Erica roll.

  • The Panzer IV and its Allied counterpart, the Valentine Mk VIII, are excellent all-around tanks that I’ve performed consistently well with. I’d love to operate the M4 Sherman and T-34 at some point, as well. Having tried some of the Panzerstorm gameplay for myself, the scale of the tank battles on this map are inadequate, and I hope DICE introduces a new game mode for armoured warfare involving only tanks.

  • Here, I operate a Sd. Kfz 251 Pakwagen and used it to shell enemies from afar while waiting for a losing match to end, having entered one after a squad mate abandoned it. The Allied counterpart is theT48 57 mm Gun Motor Carriage, and these are among the less expensive of the reinforcements, providing squads with impressive firepower and unlimited ammunition at the expense of durability. For the most part, these are not brought into the game often: squad leaders end up saving up their requisition points to call in the rocket strikes.

  • There was a bug I encountered where the game would drop me from a server at random. This was my biggest gripe with the game, and the latest patches appear to deal with this. Here on Devastation, I run the M1907 SL, the fastest-firing assault rifle available in Battlefield V. Unlike its Battlefield 1 counterpart, the M1907 SL is a close quarters weapon with a high damage output at the expense of accuracy at range. It’s much more fun to use than the Battlefield 1 version, and the same can be said of the Lewis Gun, which is a beast.

  • Returning to Rotterdam, I’ve found my performance here to be solid, thanks in no small part to the fact that I know where everything is and can anticipate where enemies are coming from. It’s been two months and some since I last stood in Rotterdam, and things in real life have changed considerably. With all of the documentation and formalities wrapped up, I’ve taken the past few days off to rest, before taking up a new post. On my down time, I decided to visit the new Central Library that opened last month. It’s a clean, elegant building with plenty of open spaces and abundant lighting. The ship-shaped building reminds me of those modern European structures I saw in books from the library, and I’ve long been fond of modern architecture in this style.

  • The trick to Battlefield V really ends up being patience: instead of camping, one should move around in a strategic manner, from cover to cover, and ideally, with squad mates. After a rough start, it’s time to slow things down and then see about getting my KD ratio back up. My win-loss ratio has levelled out now. I still think that suppressed weapons should play a role in the game: presently, players are automatically spotted on the mini-map after a kill to alert enemy players to their presence. This is counted a bug, but I would think it is acceptable to keep this as a feature, and then add suppressors as a weapon specialisation that exchanges firepower for stealth. Players running suppressors would not show up on the map, but then, this could come with the tradeoff that the weapon is slower to draw and raise up for ADS.

  • Battlefield V‘s medal system is fabulous; I earned my first medal within twelve hours of play for capturing a hundred objectives, standing in contrast with Battlefield 1, whose medal system was difficult to work with. Despite the initial setbacks and difficulties, I think I’m slowly getting the hang of Battlefield V now. Pushing through the ranks, I am looking forwards to seeing what there is to do in Battlefield V outside of the conventional progression system: Tides of War is live now, and there’s so much to unlock and focus on. With my limited play time in the future, I’ll have to balance my time between watching anime and living the Girls und Panzer and Strike Witches in Frostbite Engine experience.

With new content to be consistently delivered over time, along with new activities and objectives, Battlefield V could stand to provide very solid entertainment. The current maps and content introduce players to more obscure aspects of World War Two; noticeably absent are iconic set-pieces and weapons. There is no Normandy Landing, Stalingrad, Iwo Jima or liberation of Hong Kong yet, nor the M1 Garand. While I appreciate the coverage of lesser-known battles and weapons, a World War Two title would not be complete without these elements. The Tides of War has the potential of including these events and weapons, and in particular, I am hoping that DICE includes the Pacific Campaign as a part of their Tides of War update. For the time being, however, my aim is to go through the progression system and unlock as much content as I can that will allow me to replicate the various Girls und Panzer and Strike Witches loadouts. Out of the gates, iconic weapons such as the Bren Machine Gun and MG 34 are quickly unlocked, allowing players to run as Perrine and Hanna (in a manner of speaking). Erica’s MP 40 is also available for use. Battlefield V‘s setup will not accommodate faithful replications of loadouts: the PIAT is a part of the assault class, so one cannot run the PIAT with the Bren, and with melee weapons being a little less diverse, no sabres are available at present. On the side of armour, I’ve taken to focusing on levelling up my Panzer IV: beginning with the Ausf. D version that Miho operates early on, one can push the Panzer IV to its Ausf. H configuration (as seen in Girls und Panzer Das Film) with the 75mm KwK 40 L/43 anti-tank cannon and Schürzen skirts. Should DICE release the appropriate customisations, I could decorate my armour in Ooarai colours: at present, a dark brown vehicle skin and custom emblems are unavailable. Battlefield V certainly did take a risk with its audience – whether or not it succeeds now will depend on how well post-launch content and updates are handled; there is definitely the possibility that Battlefield V could include enough content to make it memorable in terms of both gameplay and customisation, and this is an encouraging thought as I push through the game.

Battlefield V: A Reflection on the Open Beta

“This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.” —Winston Churchill

While Battlefield V may have been hampered by a sub-optimal marketing campaign, its biggest selling point lies within gameplay. The closed alpha was a fantastic opportunity to see how the new weapon mechanics and gameplay elements, such as attrition and squad play, functioned, although Battlefield V itself was evidently still in development at that stage; various bugs, such as being unable to spawn, falling through the map, being unable to change squads and performance issues were prevalent. As well, many features simply were not present in the build: the game’s progression and customisation system was a no-show in the alpha, for instance. By the time of the open beta two months later, Battlefield V has come a long way — the game handles very smoothly, and the stutter I experienced in the alpha, especially when being revived or spawning onto teammates, had been rectified. The classes have also undergone some changes, with the assault being assigned longer-range weapons for medium range, precise combat, and the medic class gaining access to submachine guns to fit their role as close-quarters support for squad members. Each class also gains a unique ability: assault players regenerate health faster, medic players can revive any teammate faster than squad members can revive squad mates, support players can build heavier fortifications, and recon players can run faster when damaged. The emphasis on unique class roles is carried over from Battlefield 1 — in conjunction with the fortifications and attrition elements, Battlefield V handles quite differently than its predecessors, forcing players to be even more mindful of their surroundings than in previous instalments of Battlefield. While these new elements seem quite daunting, they are woven into Battlefield V neatly, and ultimately, offer a new way to experience Battlefield, bringing tactical elements into the game and encouraging players to explore their environments in more detail than before.

At the end of the day, however, Battlefield V is a first person shooter, and as such, focus remains predominantly on the weapons and their handling. Battlefield 1 was frustrating with its random bullet deviation, which reduced the potency of skill in a firefight; players with sure aim and mastery of their weapon could still occasionally miss shots from this, and the time to kill was also quite lengthy. Battlefield V‘s closed alpha had a Battlefield 4-era TTK, allowing skilled players to drop enemies exceptionally quickly, and with some weapons lacking recoil and the insufficient damage indicators, meant firefights were somewhat frustrating if one did not get the drop on their opponents. By the open beta, it seems DICE has gone with a balance between the two extremes: TTKs are faster and more satisfying than those of Battlefield 1, but slower than the closed alpha’s allowing players to duck out and escape fire if they chose to. The open beta continues to show that Battlefield V is a game of methodical team play — my best games were experienced by moving together with my squad and picking my engagements. I had no trouble topping the scoreboards and maintaining a positive KD ratio when I played this way. By comparison, in games where I became impatient to try out a newly-unlocked gun, I was slaughtered. If Battlefield V intended its players to cooperate and master its mechanics over aggressively charging into a scenario and counting on no-scopes to win the day, it has certainly succeeded in doing so. While the open beta proved quite enjoyable, the insight it provides into Battlefield V‘s progression system leaves much to be desired. Battlefield 3 and 4 had a solid system, unlocking new weapons, gadgets, attachments and weapon camouflages. Different weapons, gadgets and attachments allow players to very precisely pick their play style, giving a sense of immersion. This disappeared in Battlefield 1, and while Battlefield V‘s progression system does incentivise players to advance their classes and weapons, the decision to split weapon customisation into cosmetic and functional aspects does not make sense. In particular, that weapons have a progression tree that continue to improve the weapon’s performance does not make sense: once one unlocks all of the upgrades, their weapon will be outright superior to the player who is using that weapon for the first time. By comparison, Battlefield 3 and 4 introduced the notion of side-grades, where every attachment offered a benefit in exchange for a disadvantage. A heavy barrel might improve weapon damage at range at the expense of hip-fire accuracy, and a compensator can help some unruly weapons with horizontal accuracy, but increase muzzle flash and make a player more visible. It meant tuning a weapon was an involved and fun task, and this is something that I miss from the earlier Battlefield titles. Similarly, with the archetypes still absent, one must wonder what roles they’ll play in the full game.

Screenshots and Commentary

  • It’s been a shade more than two years ago when the Battlefield 1 open beta ended, and I ended up with two separate posts detailing my experiences. At the time, I remarked that I would buy Battlefield 1 if it ended up with a solid launch, and two years later, with 195 hours spent in the game, I feel that the open beta proved to be a valuable contributor in helping me decide whether the game was for me or not. At present, the open beta for Battlefield V has concluded, and while there are many factors that need improvement, overall, my experience was a very solid one.

  • There are a total of forty screenshots in this post, and while it has been past tradition for me to open with me scoring a melee kill, the gunplay in Battlefield V is superb. When I spawned into my first match on Rotterdam, however, most of the combat was actually opposite to where I was, so I found myself exploring the map and trying to get to one of the capture points before dying to an assault player from around the corner. I subsequently hopped into a Panzer IV and shelled enemies trying to capture the train station.

  • The Panzer IV is likely in its Ausf. D form, and with its upgrade tree, I imagine that there should be no trouble in giving it the equipment needed to make it resemble the Ausf. F2 that Miho and her friends operate. Vehicle gameplay in Battlefield V is more skill-based than its previous counterparts: tank turrets are slower to rotate and have some inertia to them, meaning that one cannot simply look and immediately begin firing at enemies: the turret has to “catch up” to where one is looking before one’s shots begin landing.

  • Battlefield V‘s sniping mechanics are a return to the days of Battlefield 4 and 3, where center-mass shots were unable to kill in one shot at any range. Emphasis is returned to headshots, and sniper rifles again have different handling characteristics, whereas in Battlefield 1, bolt action rifles were largely differentiated by their sweet spot ranges and bullet speeds. The open beta starts recon players with the Lee-Enfield No. 4 Mk I, which has a ten-round capacity, a lower bullet velocity and a quicker firing rate compared to the Karabiner 98.

  • The medic class got the least use during my time in the open beta: I only reached rank two with the medic. While medics no longer carry a syringe gadget and thus, have a slot free for another gadget. I’m not sure if it was a bug or not, but I found myself resupplying teammates with the medic’s bandage pouches. This could simply be a UI error, although the absence of a dedicated syringe tool took some getting used to.

  • We’ve still yet to see all of the available weapons for Battlefield V, and I’m still hoping that the iconic MG42 will be available as an infantry-portable weapon for the support class. This would allow me to emulate the Karlsland Witch loadout: the weapon was infamous for its high firing rate and was nicknamed “Hitler’s Buzzsaw” for the distinct sound it made. On top of this, the weapon was incredibly reliable and had a quick-change barrel. With all of the sophisticated, detailed animations in Battlefield V, I would not be surprised if overheating an MG42 would result in the player manually replacing the barrel, which could be an innovative way to offset its high firing rate.

  • Having tried them with a greater frequency, I feel that reinforcements replace Battlefield 1‘s behemoths. This is quite welcome, since it means that players contributing to their team will have a chance to further assist with resupplies and powerful weaponry, but without needing to be on a losing team. The Sturmtiger was one of the reinforcements available to the German forces in the beta and the vehicle itself was originally intended for infantry support. I went on a short killstreak with it before getting over confident, driving it to point B and then watching as other players smashed the Sturmtiger with Panzerfausts after I got stuck.

  • Returning to Narvik, the dialed-back particle effects are noticeable, and the map looks a lot clearer now. Here, I take Darjeeling’s tank of choice, the Churchill Mk. VII, for a spin and blast enemies for a double kill. Because of turret inertia, limited ammunition and the presence of effective anti-tank weapons, tanks are no longer invincible monstrosities: I vividly recall Battlefield 1‘s FT-17 during the open beta, which was so overpowered that I went on a 21-streak with it. By comparison, the best kill-streak I’ve been on during this open beta was a more modest 9 with the Valentine Mk. III, and my Battlefield 1 record is a 13-streak.

  • Bolt-action rifles have taken a major reduction in effectiveness with center mass shots to the point where a body shot at range does around 55 damage (and 70 in close quarters). This is taking it a little far: raising their maximum damage to around 80-90, as per Battlefield 4 and having it trail out to 60 past 100 metres would make the rifles more powerful without decreasing the value of headshots. When headshots do connect with bolt-action rifles in Battlefield V, however, the results are incredibly satisfying.

  • It took me a little while to warm up to the progression system; weapons no longer need a currency to buy and unlock automatically once a class rank is reached. I immediately purchased the Gewehr 43 again and put the medium optics on it, as this configuration served me particularly well during the closed alpha. In fact, it was a little too effective, and for the beta, its vertical recoil was increased. Damage was also reduced slightly, but the weapon remains exceptionally effective.

  • A good set of optics on the Gewehr 43, and a healthy sense of caution means that with it, one can do very well at medium ranges. The trick is not to spam fire, and instead, place one’s shots more carefully. The skill ceiling for the Gewehr 43 makes the weapon a powerful all-around weapon, but during the beta, I saw many folks continue to run around with the StG 44, which has more recoil but otherwise remains superbly effective.

  • The support class was easily the weakest in Battlefield 1, but in Battlefield V, their machine guns gain the ability to penetrate soft cover like wood, and overall, the weapons are much more reliable at medium ranges. Playing support at close range is not viable like it was in Battlefield 3 and 4, where I ran around with the M249 and hip-fired like a madman, but with high accuracy at those medium ranges, one can consistently hit more distant targets than was possible with the LMGs from Battlefield 1.

  • My performance in Battlefield V has been consistently good from a KD perspective: in most Battlefield games, my lack of patience is the cause behind most of my deaths, and is only offset by the fact that I am very focused on objectives and team-oriented tasks, which earn enough points so that I can reach close to the top of the scoreboard despite a smaller number of kills. However, for Battlefield V, the attrition mechanics, and the advantages of a more cautious play-style means I adopt a defense-drive strategy, sticking around and fortifying a capture point until teammates arrive, and then capturing new points only with help.

  • The class-specific ranks return from Battlefield 1 and 3: in Battlefield V, class ranks unlock weapons, whereas in Battlefield 4, using a weapon class unlocked weapons. This system was a minor gripe I had with Battlefield 4, since it meant that weapon classes I rarely used, such as the marksman rifles, would be more difficult to unlock. By comparison, Battlefield 3 tied weapon unlocks with class usage, making it relatively simple to earn new weapons.

  • Ribbons in Battlefield V are still a bit of a mystery to me: while they must work similarly to how ribbons worked in previous Battlefield games, the criteria for unlocking them are not yet known. Here, I earn one ribbon for capturing points on Rotterdam, a map that is considered to be the Amiens of Battlefield V: an urban location with narrow streets, courtyards, a harbour and a rail bridge, it offers a bit of everything in terms of combat environments and each class is useful in its own right in different parts of the map.

  • After unlocking the Bren gun, I immediately gravitated towards it. Compared to the closed alpha, the Bren in the open beta has less recoil. While hitting for less damage per shot, its strength is accuracy, making it a solid weapon at medium ranges. Its main detriment is a lower firing rate, making it quite unsuitable for close quarters combat: during pinches where I encountered a medic or assault player up close, their Sten gun or StGs melted me after I got a few shots off.

  • Of course, against unsuspecting enemies at close range, the Bren is quite powerful, and inspection of my screenshots show that I am running with the AA sights. These unobtrusive sights make it much easier to aim the weapon at medium ranges, and a major benefit of a World War Two setting is that more weapon accessories can be used. There is a better selection of sights in the game that make it much easier to use many weapons; one of my weak points in Battlefield 1 was that I was ineffective with iron sights and so, I tend to avoid iron-sight weapons.

  • Bullet drop is much more noticeable in Battlefield V than it was in Battlefield 1: at ranges past 80 metres, one must begin compensating for gravity to land headshots on distant foes. Besides more pronounced bullet drop, the recon class of Battlefield V is also strongly affected by changes to the game mechanics. Spotting has been modified so that only the recon can spot enemies on the mini-map with their binoculars and flares. This increases their value in providing reconnaissance to their team. 3D-spotting is also absent, forcing players to visually recognise enemy soldiers.

  • Planes were left with a severe disadvantage with the changes in spotting, and while they’ve been given additional equipment to spot players on the ground for longer periods, other players have remarked that planes were much less effective. I had the chance to fly for a short period before going out of bounds and exploding for deserting: the planes handle more smoothly than they did in the alpha, but the small number of planes in the sky means dogfights are rare, and while I never tried for myself, strafing ground targets is also tricky. By comparison, tanks are very effective and enjoyable to use: here, I shell an enemy while trying to capture D point.

  • The FG-42 is a new addition to Battlefield V, being a high rounds-per-minute automatic rifle with a correspondingly high damage output and smaller magazine capacity. It is functionally similar to a battle rifle and in World War Two, was a limited production weapon intended for use by the Fallschirmjäger airborne infantry. Highly advanced for its time, the FG-42’s gas-operated mechanics influenced the systems used in the American M60.

  • German weapons of World War Two were among the most sophisticated in the world, and many of their elements made their way into modern weapon systems. The StG 44 is one of the most notable examples: the notion of firing intermediate cartridges in automatic combined the range of a rifle with the close-quarters efficacy of a submachine gun, and the StG 44 directly influenced the Avtomat Kalashnikova line of rifles, whose family and its derivatives have become the most widely-produced assault rifle in the world.

  • Without the blowing snow on Narvik, the map has a much cleaner feel to it and is reminiscent of some of Battlefield 1‘s In The Name of The Tsar maps. Volga River and Brusilov Keep were particularly enjoyable, and I became familiar enough with both maps to excel with all classes. This is my own metric for what makes a map fun: a well-designed map will allow all classes to be effective on it, featuring enough choke points, narrow corridors and open spaces so that players can choose their engagements and move in a more tactical manner to reach their destinations without a single class being dominant over others.

  • In both Battlefield V maps during the open beta, the only class I struggled with was the medic class and its submachine guns. Traditionally, I excel with these hip fire machines: PDWs were among my favourite weapons to run in Battlefield 3 and 4, and in Battlefield 1, submachine guns dominate my list of most-used weapons alongside the bolt-action rifles. For some reason, Battlefield V‘s submachine guns were not as effective in my hands, and this is probably because I became accustomed to playing at longer ranges.

  • We’re very nearly halfway into September by this point in time, and readers will have noted that I’ve got very few posts out. Besides a single post for Harukana Receive, and now, this post on Battlefield V, this blog’s been remarkably quiet. The reason for this is because circumstances in real life have led me to prioritise other things over blogging for the moment. For the first week of this month, I was in Winnipeg, Manitoba on work-related matters.

  • The work itself was quite challenging, but not from a technical perspective; every day left me exhausted. Even after I returned home, I’ve still been putting in non-standard hours and working on weekends in a bid to try and finish my assignment, and the end result of this is that I’ve been much more tired and dejected of late. Being of this mindset is certainly not conducive towards writing good blog posts, and I made an exception for Battlefield V‘s open beta because it was a welcome and enjoyable escape. While in Winnipeg, I was carrying my MacBook Pro; while a reliable and capable machine, it’s not capable of playing the shooters I typically partake in.

  • When things get challenging, I cope by breaking things down and taking everything one step at a time, as well as setting milestones to look forwards to. In Winnipeg, a good meal at the end of the day was that milestone. I am striving to conclude this project to the best of my ability and hope that there will be a bit of a breather before I return to my current work. Back in Battlefield V‘s open beta, towards the end, I figured out where weapon attachments could be added and so, put one of the sights on the StG 44. The result was a fun boost in performance that included a neat double kill here.

  • Having good sights is the difference between night and day, making it much easier to track targets. Of all the cosmetic changes, sights are the one that are worth looking into, since they directly affect one’s performance by helping improve visibility. Insofar, I’ve not seen anything to suggest that Battlefield V will have side grade style weapon attachments that positively impact performance in one area at the cost of another. The weapon tree gives weapons straight upgrades, which leaves players at a disadvantage.

  • Of course, with DICE pushing back the release date to November 20, there remains time to tune some concepts and features, so my final verdict on whether or not I’ll get the game will be made once I learn more about the final product. On the topic of release dates, Metro Exodus will be releasing in February 22, 2019, and DOOM: Eternal will be releasing somewhere in 2019. The Divison 2 will release on March 15, 2019, and there could be an open beta to try the game out come February 2019, as well.

  • Here, I wield the M1A1 carbine, which is a fast-firing semi-automatic rifle that deals less damage than the Gewehr 43 and is better suited for close quarters engagements than long range. It’s a bit of a fun weapon to use, and the high firing rate means it is more forgiving of missed shots in close range. In a few screenshots earlier, I fielded the ZH-29, a self-loading rifle that functions as a designated marksman rifle and can kill with two shots. This weapon is better suited for snipers who prefer a more aggressive role in capturing objectives and pushing alongside teammates, although it can hold its own in longer range engagements, as well.

  • The M1A1 is a variation of the M1 Carbine used by paratroopers and has a folding stock, and despite its designation, is unrelated to the famous M1 Garand. The M1 Garand is an iconic American service rifle widely used in World War Two, replacing the bolt-action M1903 in 1930 and used until the M14 was issued. With an eight-round clip, the weapon has a distinct pinging sound when the clip is ejected. Commonly portrayed in World War Two games, it would be quite surprising not to see this weapon in Battlefield V, and I am curious to see what DICE’s sound and animation engineers did for the weapon.

  • For me, the politics surrounding a video game do not have any influence on whether or not I will buy the game or enjoy it. While I consider myself moderately current with events around me, I feel that the various culture wars on the internet are not meritorious of consideration: life is much too short for one to be worried about taking sides in things that ultimately amount to nothing. The point of video games (and other forms of entertainment that often are scrutinised in culture wars) is to help folks relax, and so, I find that the worth of a game (and entertainment in general) is judged in how well it can help its audience relax and escape.

  • As a consequence, all of the debate surrounding the presence of female soldiers in Battlefield and unusual, steampunk-style customisations ends up being a waste of time. The merit of a game lies in how well it handles and whether or not it offers incentive to return. With this being said, I am of the mind that Battlefield V‘s marketing campaign was quite weak: Battlefield 1 managed to make me excited about the World War One setting, and a powerful campaign trailer ultimately helped make the decision to buy the game an easy one. Released on September 27, 2016, the trailer created a sense of respect and admiration for those who gave their lives in World War One.

  • The campaign trailer for Battlefield 1 was set to Really Slow Motion’s “Sun and Stars”, and with the end of September approaching, I am curious to see what kind of trailer Battlefield V has for its campaign. On the whole, Battlefield V‘s reveal trailer was the weakest, and newer trailers do create some excitement in the game for me. However, for most, first impressions matter, and DICE’s marketing team has struggled to recapture interest in the game following its disastrous reveal trailer.

  • Here, I call in the Allied equivalent of the Sturmtiger: this is the Churchill Crocodile, a heavy flame tank that featured a flamethrower in addition to its QF 75mm main gun. In Battlefield V, the flamethrower has a shorter range than the original tank’s 110m, and it is operated by a passenger. When I first called one in, it was moments away from the end of a losing game, and no one bothered to sit in the tank, but I managed to score some kills with it.

  • As far as major bugs go, Battlefield V still has an issue where the game may occasionally treat players as alive when they’re killed, and on one instance, I was unable to spawn back in, forcing me to quite and re-join the server. Beyond this, my experiences have been very smooth, and even on my computer, which is five-and-a-half years old now, the game still runs very well.

  • While sitting in the front gunner’s seat in a Tiger I tank, I somehow managed to blow up a light vehicle with the machine gun. While drivers are constrained by ammunition, secondary gunners have unlimited ammunition, making them powerful support for tank drivers: an observant secondary gunner can provide some covering fire for a driver while they are reloading or capturing a point.

  • Like the Battlefield 1 open beta, my best kill-streak was accomplished in the driver’s seat of a tank: it was the FT-17 in Battlefield 1, and in Battlefield V, it’s the Valentine Mk. VIII, an infantry tank that proved durable and reliable. The Mk VIII variant has a six-pounder, and in Battlefield V, it is quite manoeuvrable: I had no trouble in dispatching players who had flanked my tank with the aim of placing dynamite or AT mines, although the enemy team eventually brought Panzerfausts to the party, ending my streak at nine.

  • Towards the end of the game, I scored enough points to call in another Crocodile and single-handedly captured point B. I called in one V-1 rocket during one of my early matches to help clear a point on Rotterdam, but the close quarters environments and buildings make the V-1 (or the Allied counterpart, the JB-2) less effective than in the open spaces of Narvik. This brings my Battlefield V open beta post to a close: altogether, I spent around nine-and-a-half hours in the open beta and tried out many of the features. I did miss out on unlocking the M30 Drilling, a triple-barrel weapon with two shotgun barrels and one barrel for a rifle round. Overall, the beta was enjoyable, more so than Battlefield 1‘s, and if the launch is smooth, I may consider buying Battlefield V. For the near future, however, I will be returning my focus to anime, and the next post will be on Harukana Receive‘s penultimate episode this Friday.

While a step in the right direction, and being exciting for shaking up the way Battlefield plays, Battlefield V is still rough around the edges at present. The progression system is not as meaningful as it was in Battlefield 4 or 3, and some mechanics remain unimplemented even in this beta build (noticeably, the ability to drag downed teammates to a safer location before reviving them). It is unsurprising, then, that DICE has pushed back the release date for Battlefield V to November 20. This was a solid move on their part, as the extra time allows them to release a more polished, finished product over a broken one. From the open beta, there is much that needs to be improved on: besides a baffling progression system, the UI also needs improvement. Text is sometimes invisible, contrast is jarring in places, and the flash for earning an award or unlock is so bright that it can block out what I’m trying to shoot at. Time will tell whether or not Battlefield V will address these problems and put a rocky reveal beyond it: the gameplay itself is quite solid, and the World War Two setting has already provided many exciting possibilities for settings that could be explored. I’ve already spent many a match running the Miho Nishizumi and Darjeeling loadouts, as well as running around with Perrine’s Bren gun; it will be quite interesting to see what directions Battlefield V takes, and if the open beta was any indicator, the hit detection and performance does not seem to be an issue. Battlefield 4‘s launch was terrible, and it took a year for the game to stablise to the point where players deeply enjoyed it. If Battlefield V has a solid launch, with the ongoing release of content through the Tides of War, I imagine that there would be enough new content to enjoy that would make the price of admissions worthwhile, and that over time, I could acclimatise to the new progression system, even if it is not as sophisticated as the one I’ve come to enjoy in Battlefield 4 and 3. I’ve never been one to pre-order games, but as I did with Battlefield 1, my decision to pick up the game will be motivated largely by what I hear of its performance and gameplay post-launch — a Battlefield V that features solid gun-play and stable netcode will be one that I would be willing to shell out the full price for, as I am quite sure that I will get used to the new mechanics quite quickly and begin enjoying what is the closest we’ve ever had of a proper Strike Witches/Girls und Panzer game in the Frostbite Engine.